Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 May 1;20(3):577-83.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001514. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

Towards public health decision support: a systematic review of bidirectional communication approaches

Affiliations
Review

Towards public health decision support: a systematic review of bidirectional communication approaches

Brian E Dixon et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the literature describing computer-based interventions aimed at improving bidirectional communication between clinical and public health.

Materials and methods: A systematic review of English articles using MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Search terms included public health, epidemiology, electronic health records, decision support, expert systems, and decision-making. Only articles that described the communication of information regarding emerging health threats from public health agencies to clinicians or provider organizations were included. Each article was independently reviewed by two authors.

Results: Ten peer-reviewed articles highlight a nascent but promising area of research and practice related to alerting clinicians about emerging threats. Current literature suggests that additional research and development in bidirectional communication infrastructure should focus on defining a coherent architecture, improving interoperability, establishing clear governance, and creating usable systems that will effectively deliver targeted, specific information to clinicians in support of patient and population decision-making.

Conclusions: Increasingly available clinical information systems make it possible to deliver timely, relevant knowledge to frontline clinicians in support of population health. Future work should focus on developing a flexible, interoperable infrastructure for bidirectional communications capable of integrating public health knowledge into clinical systems and workflows.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram outlining manuscript selection process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Greenes RA. Definition, scope, and challenges. In: Greenes RA, ed. Clinical decision support: the road ahead. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, Inc., 2007:3–29
    1. Wright A, Sittig DF, Ash JS, et al. Clinical decision support capabilities of commercially available clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:637–44 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, et al. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:965–70 - PubMed
    1. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742–52 - PubMed
    1. Jaspers MW, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H, et al. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18: 327–34 - PMC - PubMed