Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and providers, 2001-2010
- PMID: 23469165
- PMCID: PMC3587616
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055504
Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and providers, 2001-2010
Abstract
Background: Pharmaceutical firms heavily promote their products and may have changed marketing strategies in response to reductions in new product approvals, restrictions on some forms of promotion, and the expanding role of biologic therapies.
Methods: We used descriptive analyses of annual cross-sectional data from 2001 through 2010 to examine direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) (Kantar Media) and provider-targeted promotion (IMS Health and SDI), including: (1) inflation-adjusted total promotion spending ($ and percent of sales); (2) distribution by channel (consumer v. provider); and (3) provider specialty both for the industry as a whole and for top-selling biologic and small molecule therapies.
Results: Total promotion peaked in 2004 at US$36.1 billion (13.4% of sales). By 2010 it had declined to $27.7B (9.0% of sales). Between 2006 and 2010, similar declines were seen for promotion to providers and DTCA (both by 25%). DTCA's share of total promotion increased from 12% in 2002 to 18% in 2006, but then declined to 16% and remains highly concentrated. Number of products promoted to providers peaked in 2004 at over 3000, and then declined 20% by 2010. In contrast to top-selling small molecule therapies having an average of $370 million (8.8% of sales) spent on promotion, top biologics were promoted less, with only $33 million (1.4% of sales) spent per product. Little change occurred in the composition of promotion between primary care physicians and specialists from 2001-2010.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that pharmaceutical companies have reduced promotion following changes in the pharmaceutical pipeline and patent expiry for several blockbuster drugs. Promotional strategies for biologic drugs differ substantially from small molecule therapies.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Trends in direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription contraceptives.Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 22. Contraception. 2016. PMID: 26808088
-
Medical Marketing in the United States, 1997-2016.JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):80-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19320. JAMA. 2019. PMID: 30620375
-
A statistical analysis of the magnitude and composition of drug promotion in the United States in 1998.Clin Ther. 2003 May;25(5):1503-17. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80136-4. Clin Ther. 2003. PMID: 12867225
-
Direct-to-consumer promotion of prescription drugs. Economic implications for patients, payers and providers.Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(2):109-19. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119020-00001. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001. PMID: 11284378 Review.
-
Direct marketing of pharmaceuticals to consumers.Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:73-91. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140537. Epub 2001 Oct 25. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002. PMID: 11910055 Review.
Cited by
-
Pharmaceutical Drug Promotion and Rational Drug Use: Assessment of Healthcare Workers Perspective.Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2024 Aug 13;13:127-138. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S466004. eCollection 2024. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2024. PMID: 39156079 Free PMC article.
-
Inequitable Distribution of Global Economic Benefits from Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination.Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jul 12;12(7):767. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12070767. Vaccines (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39066405 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Drug Characteristics and Manufacturer Spending on Direct-to-Consumer Advertising.JAMA. 2023 Feb 7;329(5):386-392. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23968. JAMA. 2023. PMID: 36749334 Free PMC article.
-
Financial Conflicts of Interest in Propensity Score-Matched Studies Evaluating Biologics and Biosimilars for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 1;5(5):214-220. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwac018. eCollection 2022 Oct. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 36196272 Free PMC article.
-
Critical Appraisal of Drug Promotional Literature in Accordance With WHO Guidelines.Cureus. 2022 Aug 3;14(8):e27644. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27644. eCollection 2022 Aug. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36072198 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Donohue JM, Cevasco M, Rosenthal MB (2007) A decade of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. N Engl J Med 357: 673–681. - PubMed
-
- Rosenthal MB, Berndt ER, Donohue JM, Frank RG, Epstein AM (2002) Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers. N Engl J Med 346: 498–505. - PubMed
-
- Campbell S (2009) Promotional Spending for Prescription Drugs. Congressional Budget Office Economic and Budget Issue Brief. Available: http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/105xx/doc10522/12-02-DrugPromo_Brief.pdf. Accessed 2012 Sep 5.
-
- Rosenthal MB, Berndt ER, Donohue JM, Epstein AM, Frank RG (2003) Demand effects of recent changes in prescription drug promotion. Frontiers Health Policy Res 6: 1–26.
-
- Iizuka T, Jin GZ (2005) The effect of prescription drug advertising on drug visits. J Econ Manag Strategy 14: 701–727.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
