Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region
- PMID: 23478992
- PMCID: PMC3853364
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2912
Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region
Abstract
Importance: Inappropriate use of colonoscopy involves unnecessary risk for older patients and consumes resources that could be used more effectively.
Objectives: To determine the frequency of potentially inappropriate colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries in Texas and to examine variation among physicians and across geographic regions.
Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used 100% Medicare claims data for Texas and a 5% sample from the United States from 2000 through 2009. We identified Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 years or older who underwent a colonoscopy from October 1, 2008, through September 30, 2009.
Main outcome measures: Colonoscopies were classified as screening in the absence of a diagnosis suggesting an indication for the procedure. Screening colonoscopy was considered potentially inappropriate on the basis of patient age or occurrence too soon after colonoscopy with negative findings. The percentage of patients undergoing potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy was estimated for each colonoscopist and hospital service area.
Results: A large percentage of colonoscopies performed in older adults were potentially inappropriate: 23.4% for the overall Texas cohort and 9.9%, 38.8%, and 24.9%, respectively, in patients aged 70 to 75, 76 to 85, or 86 years or older. There was considerable variation across the 797 colonoscopists in the percentages of colonoscopies performed that were potentially inappropriate. In a multilevel model including patient sex, race or ethnicity, number of comorbid conditions, educational level, and urban or rural residence, 73 colonoscopists had percentages significantly above the mean (23.9%), ranging from 28.7% to 45.5%, and 119 had percentages significantly below the mean (23.9%), ranging from 6.7% to 18.6%. The colonoscopists with percentages significantly above the mean were more likely to be surgeons, graduates of US medical schools, medical school graduates before 1990, and higher-volume colonoscopists than those with percentages significantly below the mean. Colonoscopist rankings were fairly stable over time (2006-2007 vs 2008-2009). There was also geographic variation across Texas and the United States, with percentages ranging from 13.3% to 34.9% in Texas and from 19.5% to 30.5% across the United States.
Conclusions and relevance: Many colonoscopies performed in older adults may be inappropriate. The likelihood of undergoing potentially inappropriate colonoscopy depends in part on where patients live and what physician they see.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population.Arch Intern Med. 2011 Aug 8;171(15):1335-43. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.212. Epub 2011 May 9. Arch Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21555653 Free PMC article.
-
Colonoscopist and primary care physician supply and disparities in colorectal cancer screening.Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun;47(3 Pt 1):1137-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01355.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8. Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22150580 Free PMC article.
-
Limited life expectancy among a subgroup of medicare beneficiaries receiving screening colonoscopies.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Mar;12(3):443-450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014. PMID: 23973925 Free PMC article.
-
The appropriateness of more intensive colonoscopy screening than recommended in Medicare beneficiaries: a modeling study.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1568-76. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3889. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25133641 Free PMC article.
-
Volume and yield of screening colonoscopy at a tertiary medical center after change in medicare reimbursement.Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jan;98(1):194-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07172.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003. PMID: 12526957
Cited by
-
Micro-bacterial assessment of disposable gowns with a focus on green endoscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures: A Japanese pilot study for healthcare waste reduction.DEN Open. 2024 Sep 24;5(1):e70016. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70016. eCollection 2025 Apr. DEN Open. 2024. PMID: 39323618 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of alverine citrate plus simethicone in colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.Sci Rep. 2024 May 27;14(1):12035. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62922-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38802518 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Colorectal Cancer Screening Receipt Does Not Differ by 10-Year Mortality Risk Among Older Adults.Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 1;119(2):353-363. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002536. Epub 2023 Oct 27. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 37782288
-
Inappropriate Multi-Target Stool DNA Use for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Risks, Compliance, and Outcomes.Cureus. 2023 Jun 16;15(6):e40506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40506. eCollection 2023 Jun. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37397671 Free PMC article.
-
Impacts of COVID-19 on Appropriate Use of Screening Colonoscopy in a Large Integrated Healthcare Delivery System.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Aug;38(11):2577-2583. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08233-0. Epub 2023 May 25. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 37231209 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fisher DA, Galanko J, Dudley TK, Shaheen NJ. Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening in the veterans healthcare system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Aug;5(8):991–996. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
