Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S49-53.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872e80.

Pain assessment using the NIH Toolbox

Affiliations

Pain assessment using the NIH Toolbox

Karon F Cook et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: Pain is an important component of health and function, and chronic pain can be a problem in its own right. The purpose of this report is to review the considerations surrounding pain measurement in the NIH Toolbox, as well as to describe the measurement tools that were adopted for inclusion in the NIH Toolbox assessment battery.

Methods: Instruments to measure pain in the NIH Toolbox were selected on the basis of scholarly input from a diverse group of experts, as well as review of existing instruments, which include verbal rating scales, numerical rating scales, and graphical scales.

Results: Brief self-report measures of pain intensity and pain interference were selected for inclusion in the core NIH Toolbox for use with adults. A 0 to 10 numerical rating scale was recommended for measuring pain intensity, and a 6-item Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form for measuring pain interference. The 8-item PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference measure was recommended as a supplemental measure. No specific measure was recommended for measuring pain intensity in children.

Conclusions: Core and supplemental measures were recommended for the NIH Toolbox. Additional measures were reviewed for investigators who seek tools for measuring pain intensity in pediatric samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cieza A, Stucki G, Weigl M, et al. ICF core sets for chronic widespread pain. J Rehabil Med 2004;36:63–68 - PubMed
    1. Revicki DA, Chen WH, Harnam N, et al. Development and psychometric analysis of the PROMIS pain behavior item bank. Pain 2009;146:158–169 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amtmann D, Cook KF, Jensen MP, et al. Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain 2010;150:173–182 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1179–1194 - PMC - PubMed
    1. IASP Task Force on Taxonomy Part III: pain terms—a current list with definitions and notes on usage. In: Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of Chronic Pain, 2nd ed Seattle: IASP Press; 1994:209–214

Publication types