Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;48(2 Pt 1):417-34.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01452.x. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

Reporting CAHPS and HEDIS data by race/ethnicity for Medicare beneficiaries

Affiliations

Reporting CAHPS and HEDIS data by race/ethnicity for Medicare beneficiaries

Steven C Martino et al. Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To produce reliable and informative health plan performance data by race/ethnicity for the Medicare beneficiary population and to consider appropriate presentation strategies.

Data sources: Patient experience data from the 2008-2009 Medicare Advantage (MA) and fee-for-service (FFS) CAHPS surveys and 2008-2009 HEDIS data (MA beneficiaries only).

Study design: Mixed effects linear (and binomial) regression models estimated the reliability and statistical informativeness of CAHPS (HEDIS) measures.

Principal findings: Seven CAHPS and seven HEDIS measures were reliable and informative for four racial/ethnic subgroups-Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Pacific Islanders-at sample sizes of 100 beneficiaries (200 for prescription drug plans). Although many plans lacked adequate sample size for reporting group-specific data, reportable plans contained a large majority of beneficiaries from each of the four racial/ethnic groups.

Conclusions: Statistically reliable and valid information on health plan performance can be reported by race/ethnicity. Many beneficiaries may have difficulty understanding such reports, however, even with careful guidance. Thus, it is recommended that health plan performance data by subgroups be reported as supplemental data and only for plans meeting sample size requirements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams JL, Mehrotra A, Thomas JW, McGlynn EA. “Physician Cost Profiling—Reliability and Risk of Misclassification”. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;362(11):1014–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. “Physician-Patient Communication in the Primary Care Office: A Systematic Review”. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2002;15(1):25–38. - PubMed
    1. Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. “Connections between Quality Measurement and Improvement”. Medical Care. 2003;41(suppl. 1):I30–8. - PubMed
    1. Christianson JB, Volmar KM, Alexander J, Scanlon DP. “A Report Card on Provider Report Cards: Current Status of the Health Care Transparency Movement”. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2010;25(11):1235–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elliott MN, Haviland AM, Kanouse DE, Hambarsoomian K, Hays RD. “Adjusting for Subgroup Differences in Extreme Response Tendency in Ratings of Health Care: Impact on Disparity Estimates”. Health Services Research. 2009a;44(2 Part 1):542–61. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms