Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study
- PMID: 23494494
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2795-0
Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study
Abstract
Objectives: To assess factors influencing prostate cancer detection on multiparametric (T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced) MRI.
Methods: One hundred and seventy-five patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included. Pre-operative MRI performed at 1.5 T (n = 71) or 3 T (n = 104), with (n = 58) or without (n = 117) an endorectal coil were independently interpreted by two radiologists. A five-point subjective suspicion score (SSS) was assigned to all focal abnormalities (FAs). MR findings were then compared with whole-mount sections.
Results: Readers identified 192-214/362 cancers, with 130-155 false positives. Detection rates for tumours of <0.5 cc (cm(3)), 0.5-2 cc and >2 cc were 33-45/155 (21-29 %), 15-19/35 (43-54 %) and 8-9/12 (67-75 %) for Gleason ≤6, 17/27 (63 %), 42-45/51 (82-88 %) and 34/35 (97 %) for Gleason 7 and 4/5 (80 %), 13/14 (93 %) and 28/28 (100 %) for Gleason ≥8 cancers respectively. At multivariate analysis, detection rates were influenced by tumour Gleason score, histological volume, histological architecture and location (P < 0.0001), but neither by field strength nor coils used for imaging. The SSS was a significant predictor of both malignancy of FAs (P < 0.005) and aggressiveness of tumours (P < 0.00001).
Conclusions: Detection rates were significantly influenced by tumour characteristics, but neither by field strength nor coils used for imaging. The SSS significantly stratified the risk of malignancy of FAs and aggressiveness of detected tumours.
Key points: • Prostate cancer volume, Gleason score, architecture and location are MRI predictors of detection. • Field strength and coils used do not influence the tumour detection rate. • Multiparametric MRI is accurate for detecting aggressive tumours. • A subjective suspicion score can stratify the risk of malignancy and tumour aggressiveness.
Similar articles
-
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2):B5327. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28157066 Review.
-
Prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy: the role of 3-T diffusion imaging in multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging.Eur Radiol. 2013 Jun;23(6):1745-52. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2768-3. Epub 2013 Feb 2. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23377546
-
Characteristics of Detected and Missed Prostate Cancer Foci on 3-T Multiparametric MRI Using an Endorectal Coil Correlated With Whole-Mount Thin-Section Histopathology.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul;205(1):W87-92. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13285. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015. PMID: 26102423 Free PMC article.
-
How accurate is multiparametric MR imaging in evaluation of prostate cancer volume?Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):144-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140524. Epub 2014 Nov 21. Radiology. 2015. PMID: 25423145
-
The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2013 May;17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. doi: 10.3310/hta17200. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23697373 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Primary Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Gleason Grading and D'Amico Classification: A Radiomics-Based Study.Phenomics. 2023 Jul 25;3(6):576-585. doi: 10.1007/s43657-023-00108-y. eCollection 2023 Dec. Phenomics. 2023. PMID: 38223686
-
Characteristics and survival of primary urothelial carcinoma of the prostate: A multi-center retrospective study of 18 cases.Neoplasia. 2024 Jan;47:100961. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2023.100961. Epub 2023 Dec 23. Neoplasia. 2024. PMID: 38142529 Free PMC article.
-
Short repetition time diffusion-weighted imaging improves visualization of prostate cancer.Jpn J Radiol. 2023 Dec 21. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01519-7. Online ahead of print. Jpn J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 38123889
-
Role of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy: Does preoperative tumor recognition reduce the positive surgical margin in a specific location? Experience from a Thailand prostate cancer specialized center.Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 Dec 20. Asian J Urol. 2023. PMID: 38024440 Free PMC article.
-
Results of fusion prostate biopsy comparing with cognitive and systematic biopsy.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(16):15085-15090. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05293-x. Epub 2023 Aug 24. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37615820
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
