Lumbar spine repositioning sense in adolescents with and without non-specific chronic low back pain--an analysis based on sub-classification and spinal regions

Man Ther. 2013 Oct;18(5):410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

Abstract

Objective: To identify differences in repositioning error in adolescents with and without non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP), sub-groups of NSCLBP and in different spinal regions.

Methods: Spinal repositioning error was measured during a seated task. Variables were constant error (CE), absolute error (AE) and variable error (VE) for lower lumbar, upper lumbar and lumbar angles. 28 subjects with NSCLBP were sub-classified using O'Sullivans system and compared to 28 healthy controls.

Results: Significant differences were noted for AE between adolescents with and without NSCLBP, but no differences were found for CE or VE. When sub-grouped there was a pattern for lower AE and higher VE in the flexion sub-group. This group also displayed a tendency to undershoot the criterion position in the lower lumbar spine. Greater VE was noted in the extension sub-group and those with no NSCLBP in the upper lumbar compared to the lower lumbar spine.

Conclusions: Differences in spinal repositioning errors were noted between adolescents with and without NSCLBP and sub-groups of NSCLBP. Those with flexion-pattern NSCLBP had the lowest levels of spinal repositioning ability. Individuals with no-LBP (low-back pain) or extension-pattern NSCLBP displayed greater variability in the upper lumbar spine.

Keywords: Adolescence; Chronic low back pain; Proprioception; Sub-groups.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Chronic Disease
  • Disability Evaluation
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Low Back Pain / physiopathology*
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / physiopathology*
  • Male
  • Pain Measurement
  • Posture / physiology*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Western Australia