Risk factors for development of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of a systematic review
- PMID: 23526904
- PMCID: PMC3592758
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327808
Risk factors for development of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of a systematic review
Abstract
Study design: Systematic review.
Study rationale: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction that may be asymptomatic or may present with severe symptoms. Since CSM has an insidious manifestation, identification of risk factors associated with this condition may aid clinicians in monitoring high-risk patients and implementing appropriate management strategies.
Objective: To assess sociodemographic, clinical, radiographic, and genetic risk factors associated with presence of CSM in patients 18 years or older.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, the National Guideline Clearinghouse Databases, and bibliographies of key articles to assess risk factors associated with CSM. Articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each article was evaluated using a predefined quality-rating scheme.
Results: From 486 citations, eight articles met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Larger vertebral body and smaller spinal canal and Torg/Pavlov ratio were associated with CSM diagnosis, while gender was not associated with a CSM diagnosis across multiple studies. There were inconsistent reports with respect to increased age as a risk factor for CSM diagnosis.
Conclusion: The limited data available suggests that inherent anatomical features that may contribute to congenital cervical stenosis may be associated with CSM. This systematic review is limited by the small number of high-quality studies evaluating prognostic factors for CSM. The overall strength of evidence for all risk factors evaluated is low.
Similar articles
-
Outcome and predictive factors in rapid progressive cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A retrospective case-control study.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;198:106226. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106226. Epub 2020 Sep 15. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 32947192
-
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7ebbf. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 24026148
-
Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S21-36. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f2c3. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23963004 Review.
-
Predictive factors affecting outcome after cervical laminoplasty.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S232-52. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb55. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23962999 Review.
-
Predictive effect of cervical spinal cord compression and corresponding segmental paravertebral muscle degeneration on the severity of symptoms in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Spine J. 2021 Jul;21(7):1099-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.030. Epub 2021 Mar 27. Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33785472
Cited by
-
Evidence-based commentary on the diagnosis, management, and further research of degenerative cervical spinal cord compression in the absence of clinical symptoms of myelopathy.Front Neurol. 2024 May 10;15:1341371. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1341371. eCollection 2024. Front Neurol. 2024. PMID: 38798708 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Cervical Spine Degeneration Reveal Frequent Cervicolumbar Tandem Spinal Stenosis in Mexico.Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):670-677. doi: 10.14444/8520. Epub 2023 Jul 17. Int J Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 37460237 Free PMC article.
-
Congenital Cervical Stenosis: a Review of the Current Literature.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023 Sep;16(9):438-445. doi: 10.1007/s12178-023-09857-9. Epub 2023 Jul 15. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023. PMID: 37452915 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current understanding of tandem spinal stenosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and surgical strategy.EFORT Open Rev. 2022 Aug 4;7(8):587-598. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0016. EFORT Open Rev. 2022. PMID: 35924651 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Development and Natural History [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 2].Global Spine J. 2022 Feb;12(1_suppl):39S-54S. doi: 10.1177/21925682211036071. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 35174726 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singh A, Choi D, Crockard A. Use of walking data in assessing operative results for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: long-term follow-up and comparison with controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34(12):1296–1300. - PubMed
-
- Singh A, Crockard H A. Quantitative assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by a simple walking test. Lancet. 1999;354(9176):370–373. - PubMed
-
- Takamiya Y, Nagata K, Fukuda K. et al.Cervical spine disorders in farm workers requiring neck extension actions. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11(3):235–240. - PubMed
-
- Chen I H, Liao K K, Shen W Y. Measurement of cervical canal sagittal diameter in Chinese males with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1994;54(2):105–110. - PubMed
-
- Golash A, Birchall D, Laitt R D. et al.Significance of CSF area measurements in cervical spondylitic myelopathy. Br J Neurosurg. 2001;15(1):17–21. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
