Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013;8(3):e59650.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059650. Epub 2013 Mar 20.

Lung Cancer Screening With Computer Aided Detection Chest Radiography: Design and Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Lung Cancer Screening With Computer Aided Detection Chest Radiography: Design and Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Peter J Mazzone et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Introduction: The sensitivity of CT based lung cancer screening for the detection of early lung cancer is balanced by the high number of benign lung nodules identified, the unknown consequences of radiation from the test, and the potential costs of a CT based screening program. CAD chest radiography may improve the sensitivity of standard chest radiography while minimizing the risks of CT based screening.

Methods: Study subjects were age 40-75 years with 10+ pack-years of smoking and/or an additional risk for developing lung cancer. Subjects were randomized to receive a PA view chest radiograph or placebo control (went through the process of being imaged but were not imaged). Images were reviewed first without then with the assistance of CAD. Actionable nodules were reported and additional evaluation was tracked. The primary outcome was the rate of developing symptomatic advanced stage lung cancer.

Results: 1,424 subjects were enrolled. 710 received a CAD chest radiograph, 29 of whom were found to have an actionable lung nodule on prevalence screening. Of the 15 subjects who had a chest CT performed for additional evaluation, a lung nodule was confirmed in 4, 2 of which represented lung cancer. Both of the cancers were seen by the radiologist unaided and were identified by the CAD chest radiograph. The cumulative incidence of symptomatic advanced lung cancer was 0.42 cases per 100 person-years in the control arm; there were no events in the screening arm.

Conclusions: Further evaluation is necessary to determine if CAD chest radiography has a role as a lung cancer screening tool. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01663155.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow of study subjects through the trial.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 6 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 10–29. - PubMed
    1. Manser RL, Irving LB, Byrnes G, Abramson MJ, Stone CA, et al. (2003) Screening for lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Thorax 58: 784–789. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazzone PJ, Mekhail T (2007) Lung Cancer Screening. Curr Oncol Rep 9: 265–274. - PubMed
    1. Mazzone PJ (2010) Lung cancer screening: An update, discussion, and look ahead. Curr Oncol Rep 12: 226–234. - PubMed
    1. Gopal M, Abdullah SE, Grady JJ, Goodwin JS (2010) Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the baseline findings of randomized controlled trials. J Thorac Oncol 5: 1233–1239. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

Feedback