Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 25;11(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6.

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement

Don Husereau et al. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication.The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user friendly, 24 item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website (http://www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp).We hope CHEERS will lead to better reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. We encourage other journals and groups, to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in five years.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forms of economic evaluation.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 55 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance G, O’Brien J, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. Drummond MF, Schwartz JS, Jönsson B, Luce BR, Neumann PJ, Siebert U. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:244–258. - PubMed
    1. Rennie D, Luft HS. Pharmacoeconomic analyses. JAMA. 2000;283:2158–2160. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.16.2158. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neumann PJ, Stone PW, Chapman RH, Sandberg EA, Bell CM. The quality of reporting in published cost-utility analyses, 1976–1997. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:964. - PubMed
    1. Rosen AB, Greenberg D, Stone PW, Olchanski NV, Neumann PJ. Quality of abstracts of papers reporting original cost-effectiveness analyses. Med Decis Making. 2005;25:424–428. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05278932. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback