Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 May 28;61(21):2142-50.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.043. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

Impact of baseline heart failure burden on post-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator mortality among medicare beneficiaries

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Impact of baseline heart failure burden on post-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator mortality among medicare beneficiaries

Chih-Ying Chen et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to assess the impact of baseline heart failure (HF) burden on survival with primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) among Medicare recipients.

Background: Survival after primary ICD implantation may differ between trial and Medicare populations.

Methods: Linking data from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) ICD registry and the Medicare files (2005 to 2009), we identified primary ICD recipients age ≥66 years with ejection fraction ≤35%. Number of previous HF hospitalizations (prev-HF-hosp) and length of hospitalization prior to implantation were used to define HF burden. Crude all-cause mortality was estimated. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were derived from Cox models.

Results: Of 66,974 ICD recipients (73% men, 88% white, mean age 75 years), 11,876 died (average follow-up = 1.4 years), with 3-year mortality of 31%. Among patients with no prev-HF-hosp, 3-year mortality was 27% compared with 63% in those with ≥3 prev-HF-hosp (adjusted HR: 1.8). Among patients with same-day implantation, 3-year mortality was 25% compared with 53% in those with >1-week hospitalization days prior to implantation (adjusted HR: 1.9). Mortality at 3-year follow-up among the 31,685 ICD recipients with no prev-HF-hosp and same-day implantation (low HF burden) was similar to that in trials (22%).

Conclusions: Nearly one-third of Medicare ICD recipients died within 3 years, reflecting a population with more advanced age and disease than seen in trial populations for primary prevention ICD. Nearly one-half of Medicare recipients had a low HF burden and had a survival similar to trial ICD recipients. Future research is warranted to understand the effectiveness of primary ICD implantation among Medicare beneficiaries with heavy HF burdens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier cumulative crude mortality by the number of prior HF hospitalizations
After ICD placement, mortality at three years increased from 27% in patients without prior HF hospitalization to 63% in those with three or more prior HF hospitalizations. Among patient who had more than three prior HF hospitalizations, more than half died by two years of implantation.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier cumulative crude mortality by the number of days from admission to ICD implantation
Mortality at three years was more than twice as high, from 25% in patients with same-day implantation to 53% in the patients hospitalized for eight or more days before implantation. Among patients who had more than eight hospital-days before implantation, more than half died by three years.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Post-implantation Mortality among Medicare Populations with Low Burden of HF (N=31, 685)
Patient who had no HF hospitalization in the year before ICD implantation and received the device on the admission day (47%, N=31, 685) had similar mortality after ICD implantation as those in the major trials (Mortality at three-year in patients with low HF burden=22% versus 16–22% in SCD-HeFT and MADIT II).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:225–37. - PubMed
    1. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2140–50. - PubMed
    1. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:877–83. - PubMed
    1. CMS National Coverage Determination for ICD. 2005
    1. Fonarow GC, Yancy CW, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Spertus JA, Heidenreich PA. Potential impact of optimal implementation of evidence-based heart failure therapies on mortality. Am Heart J. 2011;161:1024–1030. e3. - PubMed

Publication types