Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 10 (3), e1001402

Adapting Standards: Ethical Oversight of Participant-Led Health Research

Affiliations

Adapting Standards: Ethical Oversight of Participant-Led Health Research

Effy Vayena et al. PLoS Med.

Abstract

As participant-led health research increases, Effy Vayena and and John Tasioulas examine what ethical questions are raised, and what types of standards need to be developed for appropriate ethical oversight for participant-led research projects.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Ethical considerations in PLR (resulting from comparing PLR with standard research).
Figure 2
Figure 2. A proposal for ethical oversight of PLR.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 26 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kuehn BM (2011) Patients go online seeking support, practical advice on health conditions. JAMA 305: 1644–1645. - PubMed
    1. Valente TW (2012) Network interventions. Science 337: 49–53. - PubMed
    1. Brownstein CA, Brownstein JS, Williams DS, Wicks P, Heywood JA (2009) The power of social networking in medicine. Nat Biotechnol 27: 888–890. - PubMed
    1. Prainsack B (2011) Voting with their mice: personal genome testing and the “participatory turn” in disease research. Account Res 18: 132–147. - PubMed
    1. Swan M (2012) Health 2050: the realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the Quantified Self, and the participatory biocitizen. J Pers Med 2: 93–118. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grant support

No specific funding was received for writing this article.
Feedback