Deciding on the action level for gamma camera non-uniformity is difficult because the reproducibilities of quality control measurements and service adjustments are usually unknown. This work evaluated the reproducibilities of integral uniformity (IU), differential uniformity (DU) and the corrected relative standard deviation (CRSD). The latter was calculated by removing from the relative standard deviation of the pixel counts the component due to statistical fluctuations. The reproducibility of each parameter was evaluated by analysing 10 intrinsic flood acquisitions with total counts of 2, 5, 10 and 30 million. All three parameters were less reproducible at the lower count densities, but as expected IU and DU also showed higher mean values. CRSD was consistent and highly reproducible, at all count densities. At 10 million counts CRSD had a coefficient of variation (COV) of 1.3% which was a five-fold improvement over the 6.6% and 6.1% found for IU and DU, respectively. The relative sensitivity of IU, DU and CRSD was compared in monthly measurements on 10 gamma cameras over one year. No significant difference in relative sensitivity was demonstrated: a change in camera performance produced about the same percentage change in each parameter. The precision with which service engineers adjust gamma cameras was also assessed by measuring the uniformity of 10 gamma cameras immediately after service adjustment at monthly intervals over one year. Finally, general action levels were defined for IU, DU and CRSD at 7%, 5% and 2.5% respectively.