Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;20(e1):e44-51.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001499. Epub 2013 Apr 5.

Early experience with electronic prescribing of controlled substances in a community setting

Cindy Parks Thomas  1 , Meelee Kim, Stephen J Kelleher, Ruslan V Nikitin, Peter W Kreiner, Ann McDonald, Grant M Carrow
Affiliations

Early experience with electronic prescribing of controlled substances in a community setting

Cindy Parks Thomas et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In 2010, the US Drug Enforcement Administration issued regulations allowing electronic prescribing of controlled substances (EPCS), a practice previously prohibited.

Objective: To carry out a survey of the experience of prescribers in the nation's first study of EPCS implementation.

Materials and methods: Prescribers were surveyed in a community setting before and after implementation of EPCS, to assess adoption, attitudes, and challenges.

Results: Of the 102 prescribers enabled to use EPCS and who responded to surveys before and after implementation, 70 had sent at least one controlled substance prescription electronically. Most users reported that EPCS was significantly less burdensome than expected. Over half reported that EPCS was easy to use and improved work flow, accuracy of prescriptions (69.5%), monitoring of medications (59.3%), and coordination with pharmacists, though high prior expectations for improved efficiency were not met. EPCS users reported a significant decrease in the perceived frequency of medication errors and drug diversion, compared with controls. Barriers to use of EPCS included limited pharmacy participation and instances of unreliability of the technology.

Discussion: Interest in adoption of EPCS is considerable among providers, pharmacies, and vendors. The results suggest that while most EPCS security features may be more acceptable to providers than expected, barriers such as the limited participation by pharmacies may also partly explain slow adoption rates for EPCS nationally.

Conclusions: EPCS was a better experience for many providers than they had expected, but related improvements in practice efficiency and quality of care will depend upon implementation strategies.

Keywords: controlled medications; electronic prescribing; opioids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment and participation in survey. EPCS, electronic prescribing of controlled substances.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of electronic prescriptions for controlled substances (EPCS) sent by study prescribers.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine, ed. Preventing medication errors : Quality Chasm Series. WashingtonDC: National Academies, 2006:1–24.
    1. Kaushal R, Kern LM, Barron Y, et al. Electronic prescribing improves medication safety in community-based office practices. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:530–6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abramson EL, Bates DW, Jenter C, et al. Ambulatory prescribing errors among community-based providers in two states. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:644–8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Halamka J, Aranow M, Ascenzo C, et al. E-prescribing collaboration in Massachusetts: early experiences from regional prescribing projects. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:239–44 - PMC - PubMed
    1. California Health Care Foundation. E-prescribing in California: Why aren't we there yet? March, 2012

Publication types

Substances