Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians
- PMID: 23567643
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00633
Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians
Abstract
Description: Prostate cancer is an important health problem in men. It rarely causes death in men younger than 50 years; most deaths associated with it occur in men older than 75 years. The benefits of screening with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test are outweighed by the harms for most men. Prostate cancer never becomes clinically significant in a patient's lifetime in a considerable proportion of men with prostate cancer detected with the PSA test. They will receive no benefit and are subject to substantial harms from the treatment of prostate cancer. The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guidance statement for clinicians by assessing current prostate cancer screening guidelines developed by other organizations. ACP believes that it is more valuable to provide clinicians with a rigorous review of available guidelines rather than develop a new guideline on the same topic when several guidelines are available on a topic or when existing guidelines conflict. The purpose of this guidance statement is to critically review available guidelines to help guide internists and other clinicians in making decisions about screening for prostate cancer. The target patient population for this guidance statement is all adult men.
Methods: This guidance statement is derived from an appraisal of available guidelines on screening for prostate cancer. Authors searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse to identify prostate cancer screening guidelines in the United States and selected 4 developed by the American College of Preventive Medicine, American Cancer Society, American Urological Association, and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation in Europe) instrument was used to evaluate the guidelines.
Guidance statement 1: ACP recommends that clinicians inform men between the age of 50 and 69 years about the limited potential benefits and substantial harms of screening for prostate cancer. ACP recommends that clinicians base the decision to screen for prostate cancer using the prostate-specific antigen test on the risk for prostate cancer, a discussion of the benefits and harms of screening, the patient's general health and life expectancy, and patient preferences. ACP recommends that clinicians should not screen for prostate cancer using the prostate-specific antigen test in patients who do not express a clear preference for screening. GUIDANCE STATEMENT 2: ACP recommends that clinicians should not screen for prostate cancer using the prostate-specific antigen test in average-risk men under the age of 50 years, men over the age of 69 years, or men with a life expectancy of less than 10 to 15 years.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med. 2013 May 21;158(10):I-28. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00634. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23567761 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Screening for colorectal cancer: a guidance statement from the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 6;156(5):378-86. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-5-201203060-00010. Ann Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22393133
-
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29801017
-
Summaries for patients. Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.Ann Intern Med. 2013 May 21;158(10):I-28. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00634. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23567761 No abstract available.
-
American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010.CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Mar-Apr;60(2):70-98. doi: 10.3322/caac.20066. Epub 2010 Mar 3. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010. PMID: 20200110 Review.
-
American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale.BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):543-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12318. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23924423 Review.
Cited by
-
Association of biological aging with prostate cancer: insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024 Oct 24;36(1):209. doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02861-0. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2024. PMID: 39446214 Free PMC article.
-
MR Molecular Imaging of Extradomain-B Fibronectin for Assessing Progression and Therapy Resistance of Prostate Cancer.Chem Biomed Imaging. 2024 Jun 11;2(8):560-568. doi: 10.1021/cbmi.4c00002. eCollection 2024 Aug 26. Chem Biomed Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39211789 Free PMC article.
-
Interaction between drinking and dietary inflammatory index affects prostate specific antigen: a cross-sectional study.BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 5;23(1):537. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04151-2. BMC Geriatr. 2023. PMID: 37670257 Free PMC article.
-
Different Types of Patient Health Information Associated With Physician Decision-making Regarding Cancer Screening Cessation for Older Adults.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2313367. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.13367. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37184836 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived Barriers Among Clinicians and Older Adults Aged 65 and Older Regarding Use of Life Expectancy to Inform Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review and Comparison.Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Aug;80(4):372-385. doi: 10.1177/10775587231153269. Epub 2023 Feb 18. Med Care Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 36800914 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous