GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength
- PMID: 23570745
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003
GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength
Abstract
In the GRADE approach, the strength of a recommendation reflects the extent to which we can be confident that the composite desirable effects of a management strategy outweigh the composite undesirable effects. This article addresses GRADE's approach to determining the direction and strength of a recommendation. The GRADE describes the balance of desirable and undesirable outcomes of interest among alternative management strategies depending on four domains, namely estimates of effect for desirable and undesirable outcomes of interest, confidence in the estimates of effect, estimates of values and preferences, and resource use. Ultimately, guideline panels must use judgment in integrating these factors to make a strong or weak recommendation for or against an intervention.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[GRADE guidelines 15: going from evidence to recommendation - determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):421-31. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Sep 23. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014. PMID: 25444301 German.
-
Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):282-92. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-064ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256172 Review.
-
GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jul;66(7):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013. Epub 2013 Jan 9. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 23312392
-
[GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):413-20. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014. PMID: 25444300 German.
-
Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256168 Review.
Cited by
-
Interventions on informal healthcare providers to improve the delivery of healthcare services in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 1;12:1456868. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1456868. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39411498 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacogenomics-assisted treatment versus standard of care in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06104-4. BMC Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 39379847 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Music Therapy as an Adjunctive Treatment in Pediatric Cancer Patients Receiving Traditional Therapies: A Systematic Review.J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024 May;15(4):265-276. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.4.4. Epub 2024 May 1. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39301100 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review and quality appraisal of guidelines and recommendations for home enteral tube feeding in adults.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Sep 3. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01500-1. Online ahead of print. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39227692 Review.
-
Pharmaceutical products, drugs and personal care products in European waters: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Aug 22;19(8):e0308975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308975. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39172921 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
