Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees
- PMID: 23588746
- PMCID: PMC3772716
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00002
Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees
Abstract
Background: Computer-aided detection (CAD) has rapidly diffused into screening mammography practice despite limited and conflicting data on its clinical effect.
Objective: To determine associations between CAD use during screening mammography and the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer, invasive cancer stage, and diagnostic testing.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Medicare program.
Participants: Women aged 67 to 89 years having screening mammography between 2001 and 2006 in U.S. SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) regions (409 459 mammograms from 163 099 women).
Measurements: Incident DCIS and invasive breast cancer within 1 year after mammography, invasive cancer stage, and diagnostic testing within 90 days after screening among women without breast cancer.
Results: From 2001 to 2006, CAD prevalence increased from 3.6% to 60.5%. Use of CAD was associated with greater DCIS incidence (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.23]) but no difference in invasive breast cancer incidence (adjusted OR, 1.00 [CI, 0.97 to 1.03]). Among women with invasive cancer, CAD was associated with greater likelihood of stage I to II versus III to IV cancer (adjusted OR, 1.27 [CI, 1.14 to 1.41]). In women without breast cancer, CAD was associated with increased odds of diagnostic mammography (adjusted OR, 1.28 [CI, 1.27 to 1.29]), breast ultrasonography (adjusted OR, 1.07 [CI, 1.06 to 1.09]), and breast biopsy (adjusted OR, 1.10 [CI, 1.08 to 1.12]).
Limitation: Short follow-up for cancer stage, potential unmeasured confounding, and uncertain generalizability to younger women.
Conclusion: Use of CAD during screening mammography among Medicare enrollees is associated with increased DCIS incidence, the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer at earlier stages, and increased diagnostic testing among women without breast cancer.
Primary funding source: Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography.Cancer. 2006 Feb 15;106(4):732-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21652. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16411214
-
The contribution of mammography screening to breast cancer incidence trends in the United States: an updated age-period-cohort model.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jun;24(6):905-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1286. Epub 2015 Mar 18. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015. PMID: 25787716 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1828-37. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26414882 Free PMC article.
-
Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;279(6):881-90. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0841-y. Epub 2008 Nov 21. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009. PMID: 19023581 Review.
-
Assessment of grating-based X-ray phase-contrast CT for differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in an experimental ex vivo set-up.Eur Radiol. 2013 Feb;23(2):381-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2592-1. Epub 2012 Aug 31. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 22932738 Review.
Cited by
-
Expanding Horizons: The Realities of CAD, the Promise of Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning's Role in Breast Imaging beyond Screening Mammography.Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;13(13):2133. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132133. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37443526 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient Graph Deep Learning to Predict Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype.IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2023 Sep-Oct;20(5):3117-3127. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2023.3290394. Epub 2023 Oct 10. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2023. PMID: 37379184 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting pediatric wrist fractures using deep-learning-based object detection.Pediatr Radiol. 2023 May;53(6):1125-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00247-023-05588-8. Epub 2023 Jan 18. Pediatr Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36650360
-
Development and validation of a deep learning model for detection of breast cancers in mammography from multi-institutional datasets.PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265751. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35324962 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning model improves radiologists' performance in detection and classification of breast lesions.Chin J Cancer Res. 2021 Dec 31;33(6):682-693. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.06.05. Chin J Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 35125812 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fenton JJ, Foote SB, Green P, Baldwin LM. Diffusion of computer-aided mammography after mandated Medicare coverage. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:987–989. [PMID: 20548013] - PubMed
-
- Rao VM, Levin DC, Parker L, Cavanaugh B, Frangos AJ, Sunshine JH. How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography? J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7:802–805. [PMID: 20889111] - PubMed
-
- Bazzocchi M, Mazzarella F, Del Frate C, Girometti R, Zuiani C. CAD systems for mammography: a real opportunity? A review of the literature. Radiol Med. 2007;112:329–353. [PMID: 17440698] - PubMed
-
- Cupples TE, Cunningham JE, Reynolds JC. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:944–950. [PMID: 16177413] - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous