Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jun;103(6):1128-33.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300998. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

Effectiveness and reach of the FLU-FIT program in an integrated health care system: a multisite randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness and reach of the FLU-FIT program in an integrated health care system: a multisite randomized trial

Michael B Potter et al. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: We tested the effectiveness of offering home fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) during influenza vaccination clinics to increase colorectal cancer screening (CRCS).

Methods: In a clinical trial at Kaiser Permanente Northern California influenza clinics in Redwood City, Richmond, South San Francisco, Union City, and Fresno, we randomly assigned influenza clinic dates to intervention (FIT offered) or control (FIT not offered) and compared subsequent CRCS activity.

Results: Clinic staff provided FITs to 53.9% (1805/3351) of intervention patients aged 50 to 75 years. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 26.9% (900/3351) and 11.7% (336/2884) of intervention and control patients completed an FIT, respectively, within 90 days of vaccination (P ≤ .001). The adjusted odds ratio for completing FIT in the intervention versus the control arm was 2.75 (95% confidence interval = 2.40, 3.16). In the per protocol analysis, 35.4% (648/1830) of patients given FIT and 13.3% (588/4405) of patients not given FIT completed FIT within 90 days of vaccination (P ≤ .001).

Conclusions: This intervention may increase CRCS among those not reached by other forms of CRCS outreach. Future research should include the extent to which these programs can be disseminated and implemented nationally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Study flow diagram: FLU-FIT Program, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2009–2010. Note. CRCS = colorectal cancer screening; FIT = fecal immunochemical test; FLU = influenza vaccination.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham MA, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29 - PubMed
    1. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):638–658 - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–637 - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cancer screening—United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(3):41–45 - PubMed
    1. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, Reuland D, Harris R. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(10):668–676 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances