Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction
- PMID: 23614585
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1210356
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction
Abstract
Background: Right ventricular pacing restores an adequate heart rate in patients with atrioventricular block, but high percentages of right ventricular apical pacing may promote left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We evaluated whether biventricular pacing might reduce mortality, morbidity, and adverse left ventricular remodeling in such patients.
Methods: We enrolled patients who had indications for pacing with atrioventricular block; New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I, II, or III heart failure; and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 50% or less. Patients received a cardiac-resynchronization pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (the latter if the patient had an indication for defibrillation therapy) and were randomly assigned to standard right ventricular pacing or biventricular pacing. The primary outcome was the time to death from any cause, an urgent care visit for heart failure that required intravenous therapy, or a 15% or more increase in the left ventricular end-systolic volume index.
Results: Of 918 patients enrolled, 691 underwent randomization and were followed for an average of 37 months. The primary outcome occurred in 190 of 342 patients (55.6%) in the right-ventricular-pacing group, as compared with 160 of 349 (45.8%) in the biventricular-pacing group. Patients randomly assigned to biventricular pacing had a significantly lower incidence of the primary outcome over time than did those assigned to right ventricular pacing (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% credible interval, 0.60 to 0.90); results were similar in the pacemaker and ICD groups. Left ventricular lead-related complications occurred in 6.4% of patients.
Conclusions: Biventricular pacing was superior to conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and left ventricular systolic dysfunction with NYHA class I, II, or III heart failure. (Funded by Medtronic; BLOCK HF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00267098.).
Comment in
-
Arrhythmias: Changing indications for biventricular pacing in bradycardia.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Aug;10(8):436-8. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.88. Epub 2013 Jun 11. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23752697
-
BLOCK-HF: a game changer or a step too far?Heart. 2014 Mar;100(5):361-2. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304334. Epub 2013 Jul 10. Heart. 2014. PMID: 23842032 No abstract available.
-
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction.N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 8;369(6):579. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1306998. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23924013 No abstract available.
-
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction.N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 8;369(6):578. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1306998. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23924014 No abstract available.
-
Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction.N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 8;369(6):578-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1306998. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23924015 No abstract available.
-
Will biventricular pacing replace right ventricular pacing for antibradycardia therapy?Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Sep;10(5):591-6. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2013.835552. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013. PMID: 24053252
Similar articles
-
Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling With Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Heart Failure in the BLOCK HF Trial.Circ Heart Fail. 2015 May;8(3):510-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001626. Epub 2015 Feb 19. Circ Heart Fail. 2015. PMID: 25697851 Clinical Trial.
-
Improvement in Clinical Outcomes With Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing: The BLOCK HF Study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 10;67(18):2148-2157. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.051. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27151347 Clinical Trial.
-
Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction.N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 26;361(22):2123-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907555. Epub 2009 Nov 15. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19915220 Clinical Trial.
-
Right Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure and Atrioventricular Block.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2016 Oct;13(5):230-236. doi: 10.1007/s11897-016-0299-3. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2016. PMID: 27553893 Review.
-
Should all patients with heart block receive biventricular pacing? All heart block patients with a pacemaker indication should receive biventricular pacing: one move, double the gains?Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;8(3):722-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.000626. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015. PMID: 26082528 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Risk factors and incidence of new-onset heart failure with conventional pacemaker implant: A nationwide study.Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jul 23;5(9):623-630. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.012. eCollection 2024 Sep. Heart Rhythm O2. 2024. PMID: 39493904 Free PMC article.
-
Dual-chamber vs. single-chamber pacemaker in patients in sinus rhythm with an atrioventricular block: a nationwide cohort study.Europace. 2024 Aug 30;26(9):euae238. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae238. Europace. 2024. PMID: 39271128 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients with mid-range ejection fraction.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug 17. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01882-z. Online ahead of print. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024. PMID: 39153133
-
Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Following Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Right Ventricular Pacing and Biventricular Pacing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):220. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2408220. eCollection 2023 Aug. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39076708 Free PMC article.
-
New Insights into Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 27;25(4):118. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2504118. eCollection 2024 Apr. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39076559 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous