Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Filters applied. Clear all
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Apr;17(2):144-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.11.005.

Intraobserver Reliability of Contact Pachymetry in Children

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free PMC article
Multicenter Study

Intraobserver Reliability of Contact Pachymetry in Children

Katherine K Weise et al. J AAPOS. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Central corneal thickness (CCT) is an important measurement in the treatment and management of pediatric glaucoma and potentially of refractive error, but data regarding reliability of CCT measurement in children are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of CCT measurement with the use of handheld contact pachymetry in children.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter intraobserver test-retest reliability study of more than 3,400 healthy eyes in children aged from newborn to 17 years by using a handheld contact pachymeter (Pachmate DGH55; DGH Technology Inc, Exton, PA) in 2 clinical settings--with the use of topical anesthesia in the office and with the patient under general anesthesia in a surgical facility.

Results: The overall standard error of measurement, including only measurements with standard deviation ≤5 μm, was 8 μm; the corresponding coefficient of repeatability, or limits within which 95% of test-retest differences fell, was ±22.3 μm. However, standard error of measurement increased as CCT increased, from 6.8 μm for CCT less than 525 μm, to 12.9 μm for CCT 625 μm and greater. The standard error of measurement including measurements with standard deviation >5 μm was 10.5 μm. Age, sex, race/ethnicity group, and examination setting did not influence the magnitude of test-retest differences.

Conclusions: CCT measurement reliability in children via the Pachmate DGH55 handheld contact pachymeter is similar to that reported for adults. Because thicker CCT measurements are less reliable than thinner measurements, a second measure may be helpful when the first exceeds 575 μm. Reliability is also improved by disregarding measurements with instrument-reported standard deviations >5 μm.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Bland-Altman plot showing CCT test–retest difference versus average of test–retest measurements with coefficient of repeatability (black lines; measurement 1 vs 2 only).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

Publication types

Feedback