Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jun;123(6):1399-404.
doi: 10.1002/lary.23894. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

Taste intensity in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Taste intensity in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study

Mary E Fischer et al. Laryngoscope. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: To determine the distribution of the perceived intensity of salt, sweet, sour, and bitter in a large population and to investigate factors associated with perceived taste intensity.

Study design: Cross-sectional population.

Methods: Subjects (n = 2,374; mean age, 48.8 years) were participants in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study examined during 2005 to 2008. Perceived taste intensity was measured using paper disks and a general labeled magnitude scale. Multiple linear regression was performed.

Results: Mean intensity ratings were: salt = 27.2 (standard deviation [SD] = 18.5), sweet = 20.4 (SD = 15.0), sour = 35.7 (SD = 21.4), and bitter = 49.6 (SD = 23.3). Females and those with less than a college degree education rated tastes stronger. With adjustment for age, sex, and education, stronger perceived sour and bitter intensities were related to current smoking (sour: B = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4 to 5.2; bitter: B = 2.8, 95% CI, 0.3 to 5.4) and lipid-lowering medications (sour: B = 5.1, 95% CI, 2.5 to 7.6; bitter: B = 3.2, 95% CI, 0.6 to 5.8). Alcohol consumption in the past year was related to weaker salt (B = -2.8, 95% CI, -5.3 to -0.3) and sweet intensity ratings (B = -2.3, 95% CI, -4.3 to -0.3), whereas olfactory impairment was associated with higher sweet ratings (B = 4.7, 95% CI, 1.4 to 7.9).

Conclusions: Perceived intensities were strongest for bitter and weakest for sweet. Sex and education were associated with each taste, whereas age did not demonstrate a consistent relationship. Associations with other factors differed by tastants, with current smoking and alcohol consumption being related to some tastes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of Taste Intensity by Tastant and Sex
Shaded boxes represent the interquartile range, diamonds within the boxes show the means, horizontal lines within the boxes indicate the medians, and vertical lines show the range of the data.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Glanz K, Basil M, Maibach E, Goldberg J, Snyder D. Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98(10):1118–1126. - PubMed
    1. Schiffman SS. Taste and smell in disease (first of two parts) N Engl J Med. 1983;308(21):1275–1279. - PubMed
    1. Schiffman SS. Taste and smell in disease (second of two parts) N Engl J Med. 1983;308(22):1337–1343. - PubMed
    1. Kaneda H, Maeshima K, Goto N, Kobayakawa T, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Saito S. Decline in taste and odor discrimination abilities with age, and relationship between gustation and olfaction. Chem Senses. 2000;25(3):331–337. - PubMed
    1. Kennedy O, Law C, Methven L, Mottram D, Gosney M. Investigating age-related changes in taste and affects on sensory perceptions of oral nutritional supplements. Age Ageing. 2010;39(6):733–738. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources