Design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to colorectal cancer screening among patients cared for in a community health center
- PMID: 23627550
- PMCID: PMC3656775
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-153
Design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to colorectal cancer screening among patients cared for in a community health center
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is common and leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Although screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) or endoscopy has been shown to decrease CRC mortality, screening rates remain suboptimal. Screening rates are particularly low for people with low incomes and members of underrepresented minority groups. FOBT should be done annually to detect CRC early and to reduce CRC mortality, but this often does not occur. This paper describes the design of a multifaceted intervention to increase long-term adherence to FOBT among poor, predominantly Latino patients, and the design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of this intervention compared to usual care.
Methods: In this RCT, patients who are due for repeat FOBT are identified in the electronic health record (EHR) and randomized to receive either usual care or a multifaceted intervention. The usual care group includes multiple point-of-care interventions (e.g., standing orders, EHR reminders), performance measurement, and financial incentives to improve CRC screening rates. The intervention augments usual care through mailed CRC screening test kits, low literacy patient education materials, automated phone and text message reminders, in-person follow up calls from a CRC Screening Coordinator, and communication of results to patients along with a reminder card highlighting when the patient is next due for screening. The primary outcome is completion of FOBT within 6 months of becoming due.
Discussion: The main goal of the study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of the intervention compared to usual care. Additionally, we want to assess whether or not it is possible to achieve high rates of adherence to CRC screening with annual FOBT, which is necessary for reducing CRC mortality. The intervention relies on technology that is increasingly widespread and declining in cost, including EHR systems, automated phone and text messaging, and FOBTs for CRC screening. We took this approach to ensure generalizability and allow us to rapidly disseminate the intervention through networks of community health centers (CHCs) if the RCT shows the intervention to be superior to usual care.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01453894.
Similar articles
-
Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1235-41. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2352. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24934845 Clinical Trial.
-
An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 1):301-11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23460053 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve three-year adherence to colorectal cancer screening among patients cared for in rural community health centers.Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;113:106654. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106654. Epub 2021 Dec 11. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022. PMID: 34906745 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Oct. Report No.: 08-05-05124-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Oct. Report No.: 08-05-05124-EF-1. PMID: 20722162 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening adherence in low-income settings within the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Prev Med. 2023 Jul;172:107522. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107522. Epub 2023 May 1. Prev Med. 2023. PMID: 37137414 Review.
Cited by
-
Changes in Colorectal Cancer Screening Knowledge, Behavior, Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Barriers among Community Health Clinic Patients after a Health Literacy Intervention.J Community Med Health Educ. 2017 Feb;7(1):497. doi: 10.4172/2161-0711.1000497. Epub 2017 Jan 13. J Community Med Health Educ. 2017. PMID: 28344855 Free PMC article.
-
Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb;112(2):375-382. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.555. Epub 2016 Dec 13. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28154400 Free PMC article.
-
Automated telephone communication systems for preventive healthcare and management of long-term conditions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 14;12(12):CD009921. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009921.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27960229 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Final Results of a 3-Year Literacy-Informed Intervention to Promote Annual Fecal Occult Blood Test Screening.J Community Health. 2016 Aug;41(4):724-31. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0146-6. J Community Health. 2016. PMID: 26769026 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Multifaceted Outreach to Initiate Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Aug;30(8):1178-84. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3234-5. Epub 2015 Mar 27. J Gen Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25814264 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Use of colorectal cancer tests–United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(10):253–258. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
