HIV screening practices and hospital characteristics in the US, 2009-2010
- PMID: 23633731
- PMCID: PMC3610068
- DOI: 10.1177/003335491312800306
HIV screening practices and hospital characteristics in the US, 2009-2010
Abstract
Objectives: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends HIV screening in U.S. health-care settings unless providers document a yield of undiagnosed HIV infections of <1 per 1,000 population. However, implementation of this guidance has not been widespread and little is known of the characteristics of hospitals with screening practices in place. We assessed how screening practices vary with hospital characteristics.
Methods: We used a national hospital survey of HIV testing practices, linked to HIV prevalence for the county, parish, borough, or city where the hospital was located, to assess HIV screening of some or all patients by hospitals. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the association between screening practices and hospital characteristics that were significantly associated with screening in bivariate analyses.
Results: Of 376 hospitals in areas of prevalence ≥0.1%, only 25 (6.6%) reported screening all patients for HIV and 131 (34.8%) reported screening some or all patients. Among 638 hospitals included, screening some or all patients was significantly (p<0.05) more common at teaching hospitals, hospitals with higher numbers of annual admissions, and hospitals with a high proportion of Medicaid admissions. In multivariable analysis, screening some or all patients was independently associated with admitting more than 15% of Medicaid patients and receiving resources or reimbursement for screening tests.
Conclusion: We found that few hospitals surveyed reported screening some or all patients, and failure to screen is common across all types of hospitals in all regions of the country. Expanded reimbursement for screening may increase compliance with the recommendations.
Similar articles
-
HIV screening practices in U.S. hospitals, 2009-2010.Public Health Rep. 2012 Sep-Oct;127(5):524-31. doi: 10.1177/003335491212700508. Public Health Rep. 2012. PMID: 22942470 Free PMC article.
-
Practices, Beliefs, and Perceived Barriers to Adolescent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Screening in the Emergency Department.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Sep;31(9):621-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000370. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015. PMID: 25834965
-
Prevalence of Screening for Food Insecurity, Housing Instability, Utility Needs, Transportation Needs, and Interpersonal Violence by US Physician Practices and Hospitals.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911514. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11514. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31532515 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Targeted HIV Screening in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.Curr HIV Res. 2021;19(2):106-120. doi: 10.2174/1570162X18666201123113905. Curr HIV Res. 2021. PMID: 33231157 Review.
-
HIV screening for all: the new standard of care.Cleve Clin J Med. 2007 Apr;74(4):297-301. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.74.4.297. Cleve Clin J Med. 2007. PMID: 17438679 Review.
Cited by
-
Innovation and implementation determinants of HIV testing and linkage-to-care in the U.S.: a systematic review.Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Oct 8;5(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00638-0. Implement Sci Commun. 2024. PMID: 39380128 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Potential Impact of One-Time Routine HIV Screening on Prevention and Clinical Outcomes in the United States: A Model-Based Analysis.Sex Transm Dis. 2020 May;47(5):306-313. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001147. Sex Transm Dis. 2020. PMID: 32044862 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a primary care national policy on HIV screening in France: a longitudinal analysis between 2006 and 2013.Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e920-e929. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687529. Epub 2016 Sep 26. Br J Gen Pract. 2016. PMID: 27672140 Free PMC article.
-
Black:White Disparities in HIV Mortality in the United States: 1990-2009.J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Mar;3(1):168-75. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0141-8. Epub 2015 Jul 7. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016. PMID: 26896117
-
Expanded HIV Testing and Linkage to Care: Conventional vs. Point-of-Care Testing and Assignment of Patient Notification and Linkage to Care to an HIV Care Program.Public Health Rep. 2016 Jan-Feb;131 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):107-20. doi: 10.1177/00333549161310S113. Public Health Rep. 2016. PMID: 26862236 Free PMC article.
References
-
- HIV surveillance—United States, 1981-2008 [published erratum appears in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011; 60(25):852]. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(21):689–93. - PubMed
-
- Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS. Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005;39:446–53. - PubMed
-
- Palella FJ, Jr, Delaney KM, Moorman AC, Loveless MO, Fuhrer J, Satten GA, et al. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:853–60. - PubMed
-
- Walensky RP, Paltiel AD, Losina E, Mercincavage LM, Schackman BR, Sax PE, et al. The survival benefits of AIDS treatment in the United States. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:11–9. - PubMed
-
- Detels R, Munoz A, McFarlane G, Kingsley LA, Margolick JB, Giorgi J, et al. Effectiveness of potent antiretroviral therapy on time to AIDS and death in men with known HIV infection duration. JAMA. 1998;280:1497–503. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
