Modeling the effectiveness of initial management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ
- PMID: 23644480
- PMCID: PMC3776282
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt096
Modeling the effectiveness of initial management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and the marked variability in patterns of care highlight the need for comparative effectiveness research. We sought to quantify the tradeoffs among alternative management strategies for DCIS with respect to disease outcomes and breast preservation.
Methods: We developed a disease simulation model integrating data from the published literature to simulate the clinical events after six treatments (lumpectomy alone, lumpectomy with radiation, lumpectomy with radiation and tamoxifen, lumpectomy with tamoxifen, and mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction) for women with newly diagnosed DCIS. Outcomes included disease-free, invasive disease-free, and overall survival and breast preservation.
Results: For a cohort of 1 million simulated women aged 45 years at diagnosis, both mastectomy and lumpectomy with radiation and tamoxifen were associated with a 12-month improvement in overall survival relative to lumpectomy alone. Adding radiation therapy to lumpectomy resulted in a 6-month improvement in overall survival but decreased long-term breast-preservation outcomes (likelihood of lifetime breast preservation = 0.781 vs 0.843 for lumpectomy alone). This decrement with radiation therapy was mitigated by the addition of tamoxifen (likelihood of lifetime breast preservation = 0.846).
Conclusions: Overall survival benefits of the six management strategies for DCIS are within 1 year, suggesting that treatment decisions can be informed by the patient's preference for breast preservation and disutility for recurrence. Our delineation of personalized outcomes for each strategy can help patients understand the implications of their treatment choice, so their decisions may reflect their own personal values and help improve the quality of care for patients with DCIS.
Figures
Comment in
-
Informing patient decisions regarding management of ductal carcinoma in situ.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jun 5;105(11):758-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt113. Epub 2013 May 3. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013. PMID: 23644481 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jun 16;96(12):906-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh164. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 15199110 Review.
-
Informing patient decisions regarding management of ductal carcinoma in situ.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jun 5;105(11):758-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt113. Epub 2013 May 3. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013. PMID: 23644481 No abstract available.
-
Assessment of treatment for patients with primary ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast.Ann Surg Oncol. 1998 Dec;5(8):724-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02303484. Ann Surg Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9869520
-
Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 30;107(12):djv263. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv263. Print 2015 Dec. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 26424776 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: an uncertain harm-benefit balance.Prescrire Int. 2013 Dec;22(144):298-303. Prescrire Int. 2013. PMID: 24600734 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of an online decision support tool for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using a pre-post design (AFT-25).Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 17;26(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01891-w. Breast Cancer Res. 2024. PMID: 39289750 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening in 75 + Women to Inform Shared Decision-making: a Simulation Modeling Study.J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(3):428-439. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08518-4. Epub 2023 Nov 27. J Gen Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38010458
-
Reassessing the Benefits and Harms of Risk-Reducing Medication Considering the Persistent Risk of Breast Cancer Mortality in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;41(4):859-870. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01342. Epub 2022 Dec 1. J Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36455167 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction Models and Decision Aids for Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Systematic Literature Review.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 2;14(13):3259. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133259. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35805030 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comparison of Predicted Ipsilateral Tumor Recurrence Risks in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast After Breast-Conserving Surgery by Breast Radiation Oncologists, the Van Nuys Prognostic Index, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center DCIS Nomogram, and the 12-Gene DCIS Score Assay.Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Nov 1;6(2):100607. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.020. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33912731 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sumner WE, 3rd, Koniaris LG, Snell SE, et al. Results of 23,810 cases of ductal carcinoma-in-situ. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14(5):1638–1643 - PubMed
-
- Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008/
-
- Bijker N, Meijnen P, Peterse JL, et al. Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma-in-situ: ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase III trial 10853--a study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(21):3381–3387 - PubMed
-
- Emdin SO, Granstrand B, Ringberg A, et al. SweDCIS: Radiotherapy after sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Results of a randomised trial in a population offered mammography screening. Acta Oncol. 2006; 45(5):536–543 - PubMed
-
- Fisher B, Land S, Mamounas E, Dignam J, Fisher ER, Wolmark N. Prevention of invasive breast cancer in women with ductal carcinoma in situ: an update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. Semin Oncol. 2001; 28(4):400–418 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
