Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;44(6):631-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.01.024.

Cost savings associated with prohibiting smoking in U.S. subsidized housing

Affiliations

Cost savings associated with prohibiting smoking in U.S. subsidized housing

Brian A King et al. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Tobacco smoking in multiunit housing can lead to secondhand-smoke (SHS) exposure among nonsmokers, increased maintenance costs for units where smoking is permitted, and fire risks. During 2009-2010, approximately 7.1 million individuals lived in subsidized housing in the U.S., a large proportion of which were children, elderly, or disabled.

Purpose: This study calculated the annual economic costs to society that could be averted by prohibiting smoking in all U.S. subsidized housing.

Methods: Estimated annual cost savings associated with SHS-related health care, renovation of units that permit smoking, and smoking-attributable fires in U.S. subsidized housing were calculated using residency estimates from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and previously reported national and state cost estimates for these indicators. When state estimates were used, a price deflator was applied to account for differential costs of living or pricing across states. Estimates were calculated overall and by cost type for all U.S. subsidized housing, as well as for public housing only. Data were obtained and analyzed between January and March 2011.

Results: Prohibiting smoking in all U.S. subsidized housing would yield cost savings of approximately $521 million per year, including $341 million in SHS-related healthcare expenditures, $108 million in renovation expenses, and $72 million in smoking-attributable fire losses. Prohibiting smoking in U.S. public housing alone would yield cost savings of approximately $154 million per year.

Conclusions: Efforts to prohibit smoking in all U.S. subsidized housing would protect health and generate substantial cost savings to society.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DHHS. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta GA: DHHS, CDC, Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention & Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006. - PubMed
    1. CDC. State smoke-free laws for worksites, restaurants, and bars—U.S. 2000–2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(15):472–5. - PubMed
    1. Kraev TA, Adamkiewicz G, Hammond SK, Spengler JD. Indoor concentrations of nicotine in low-income, multi-unit housing: associations with smoking behaviors and housing characteristics. Tob Control. 2009;18:438–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. King BA, Travers MJ, Cummings KM, Mahoney MC, Hyland AJ. Secondhand smoke transfer in multiunit housing. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(11):1133–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy DE, Rigotti NA, Winickoff JP. Tobacco smoke exposure in a sample of Boston public housing residents. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44(1):63–6. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources