Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer
- PMID: 23697514
- PMCID: PMC3762603
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209120
Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is the largest contributor to mortality from cancer. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) showed that screening with low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) rather than with chest radiography reduced mortality from lung cancer. We describe the screening, diagnosis, and limited treatment results from the initial round of screening in the NLST to inform and improve lung-cancer-screening programs.
Methods: At 33 U.S. centers, from August 2002 through April 2004, we enrolled asymptomatic participants, 55 to 74 years of age, with a history of at least 30 pack-years of smoking. The participants were randomly assigned to undergo annual screening, with the use of either low-dose CT or chest radiography, for 3 years. Nodules or other suspicious findings were classified as positive results. This article reports findings from the initial screening examination.
Results: A total of 53,439 eligible participants were randomly assigned to a study group (26,715 to low-dose CT and 26,724 to chest radiography); 26,309 participants (98.5%) and 26,035 (97.4%), respectively, underwent screening. A total of 7191 participants (27.3%) in the low-dose CT group and 2387 (9.2%) in the radiography group had a positive screening result; in the respective groups, 6369 participants (90.4%) and 2176 (92.7%) had at least one follow-up diagnostic procedure, including imaging in 5717 (81.1%) and 2010 (85.6%) and surgery in 297 (4.2%) and 121 (5.2%). Lung cancer was diagnosed in 292 participants (1.1%) in the low-dose CT group versus 190 (0.7%) in the radiography group (stage 1 in 158 vs. 70 participants and stage IIB to IV in 120 vs. 112). Sensitivity and specificity were 93.8% and 73.4% for low-dose CT and 73.5% and 91.3% for chest radiography, respectively.
Conclusions: The NLST initial screening results are consistent with the existing literature on screening by means of low-dose CT and chest radiography, suggesting that a reduction in mortality from lung cancer is achievable at U.S. screening centers that have staff experienced in chest CT. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; NLST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047385.).
Figures
Comment in
-
Screening: CT screening for lung cancer: winner confirmed.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul;10(7):367. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.99. Epub 2013 Jun 11. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23752727 No abstract available.
-
Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: results of the first screening round.J Comp Eff Res. 2013 Sep;2(5):433-6. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.57. J Comp Eff Res. 2013. PMID: 24236740
-
[Reduction in lung cancer mortality by screening programs in smokers--low dose spiral CT is superior to conventional chest X-ray].Rofo. 2014 Jan;186(1):14. Rofo. 2014. PMID: 24511605 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29. N Engl J Med. 2011. PMID: 21714641 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Lung cancer incidence and mortality in National Lung Screening Trial participants who underwent low-dose CT prevalence screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomised, multicentre, diagnostic screening trial.Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):590-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00621-X. Epub 2016 Mar 18. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27009070 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial.N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):920-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208962. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 24004119 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Screening for lung cancer. Too many uncertainties, even for smokers.Prescrire Int. 2014 Jan;23(145):19-23. Prescrire Int. 2014. PMID: 24516909 Review.
-
Lung cancer screening: the radiologist's perspective.Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;35(1):91-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363455. Epub 2014 Jan 30. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24481763 Review.
Cited by
-
Rethinking how mobile units can catalyze progress on lung cancer screening: a scoping review of what we have learned.J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):7143-7154. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-846. Epub 2024 Oct 30. J Thorac Dis. 2024. PMID: 39552879 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and validation of a tumor marker-based model for the prediction of lung cancer: an analysis of a multicenter retrospective study in Shanghai, China.Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 31;14:1427170. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1427170. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39544305 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy and image quality evaluation of ultrashort echo time MRI in the lungs.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 8;103(45):e40386. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040386. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39533626 Free PMC article.
-
Importance of driver gene mutation assessment and targeted therapy for patients with early‑stage non‑small cell lung cancer and non‑R0 resection.Oncol Lett. 2024 Oct 29;29(1):35. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14780. eCollection 2025 Jan. Oncol Lett. 2024. PMID: 39512503 Free PMC article.
-
A 16-year evaluation of opportunistic lung cancer screening with low-dose CT in China: comparative findings between non-smokers and smokers.BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):1322. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13056-1. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39465408 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108. - PubMed
-
- Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB. Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. VIII. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2002.
-
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
-
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. - PubMed
-
- Malarcher AM, Schulman J, Epstein LA, et al. Methodological issues in estimating smoking-attributable mortality in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:573–584. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
- N01-CN-25524/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-25513/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-25511/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-75022/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25516/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25511/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25524/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-25515/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N02-CN-63300/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA023108/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA079778/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-25516/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25522/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25518/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-25518/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-25522/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25513/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01-CA-79778/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25476/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-25514/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01 CA080098/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-25512/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25515/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N02CN63300/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25512/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U01-CA-80098/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA080098/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN25514/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CN75022/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01-CN-25476/CN/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous