Profiling individual physicians using administrative data from a single insurer: variance components, reliability, and implications for performance improvement efforts
- PMID: 23698181
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182992bc1
Profiling individual physicians using administrative data from a single insurer: variance components, reliability, and implications for performance improvement efforts
Abstract
Background: Individual physicians are increasingly being subjected to comparative performance assessments. When single-insurer data are used to profile individual physicians' performance, reliable measurements are uncertain because of small sample sizes.
Methods: Administrative data (2006-2008) from a Dutch insurer are used to examine variation in general practitioners' (GPs) performance on expenses (5 measures), utilization of hospital care (2 measures), and clinical quality for diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (6 measures). Unadjusted and adjusted multilevel models are used to separate total variance in between-GP and within-GP components. The components are used to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), reliability, and sample size requirements at common reliability thresholds.
Results: Average ICCs varied between 0.07% (hospital admissions) and 8.34% (physiotherapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients). Risk-adjustment often greatly changed the relative size of variance components and often led to lower ICCs. In addition, ICCs and thus reliability generally decreased over time. Eight measures had reliabilities > 0.70, and 3 of these (all GP-related expenses) > 0.90. Measures related to utilization of hospital care had reliabilities < 0.60 or even 0.50. For 5 measures, the vast majority of GPs had sufficient patients to reach 0.70 reliability. At a reliability of 0.90, however, there were no measures for which all GPs met the sample size requirements.
Conclusions: Reliable measurement of individual physicians' performance using single-purchaser data is challenging. For most measures reliability was insufficient to allow for high-stakes applications or even any application of profiling. Future research should continue to explore methods for enhancing the reliability of individual physicians' profiles.
Similar articles
-
Physician performance assessment: nonequivalence of primary care measures.Med Care. 2003 Sep;41(9):1034-47. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000083745.83803.D6. Med Care. 2003. PMID: 12972843
-
A three-part model for measuring diabetes care in physician practice.Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S48-52. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31814027b1. Acad Med. 2007. PMID: 17895690
-
Improving the reliability of physician performance assessment: identifying the "physician effect" on quality and creating composite measures.Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):378-87. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818dce07. Med Care. 2009. PMID: 19279511
-
Performance measures and pay for performance.Chest. 2006 Jan;129(1):188-91. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.1.188. Chest. 2006. PMID: 16424431 Review.
-
Meaningful variation in performance: a systematic literature review.Med Care. 2010 Feb;48(2):140-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd4dc3. Med Care. 2010. PMID: 20057334 Review.
Cited by
-
Is There a Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health, Beyond the Intervention and All Known Factors? A Systematic Review.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022 Jul 21;18:721-737. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S372464. eCollection 2022. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022. PMID: 35903086 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Doctors' Effect on Patients' Physical Health Outcomes Beyond the Intervention: A Methodological Review.Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 18;14:851-870. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S357927. eCollection 2022. Clin Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35879943 Free PMC article.
-
Should interventions to reduce variation in care quality target doctors or hospitals?Health Policy. 2018 Jun;122(6):660-666. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 13. Health Policy. 2018. PMID: 29703654 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
