An empirical derivation of the optimal time interval for defining ICU readmissions
- PMID: 23698182
- PMCID: PMC3714373
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318293c2fa
An empirical derivation of the optimal time interval for defining ICU readmissions
Abstract
Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) readmission rates are commonly viewed as indicators of ICU quality. However, definitions of ICU readmissions vary, and it is unknown which, if any, readmissions are associated with ICU quality.
Objective: Empirically derive the optimal interval between ICU discharge and readmission for purposes of considering ICU readmission as an ICU quality indicator.
Research design: Retrospective cohort study.
Subjects: A total of 214,692 patients discharged from 157 US ICUs participating in the Project IMPACT database, 2001-2008.
Measures: We graphically examined how patient characteristics and ICU discharge circumstances (eg, ICU census) were related to the odds of ICU readmissions as the allowable interval between ICU discharge and readmission was lengthened. We defined the optimal interval by identifying inflection points where these relationships changed significantly and permanently.
Results: A total of 2242 patients (1.0%) were readmitted to the ICU within 24 hours; 9062 (4.2%) within 7 days. Patient characteristics exhibited stronger associations with readmissions after intervals >48-60 hours. By contrast, ICU discharge circumstances and ICU interventions (eg, mechanical ventilation) exhibited weaker relationships as intervals lengthened, with inflection points at 30-48 hours. Because of the predominance of afternoon readmissions regardless of time of discharge, using intervals defined by full calendar days rather than fixed numbers of hours produced more valid results.
Discussion: It remains uncertain whether ICU readmission is a valid quality indicator. However, having established 2 full calendar days (not 48 h) after ICU discharge as the optimal interval for measuring ICU readmissions, this study will facilitate future research designed to determine its validity.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The epidemiology of intensive care unit readmissions in the United States.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 May 1;185(9):955-64. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201109-1720OC. Epub 2012 Jan 26. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22281829 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes among patients discharged from busy intensive care units.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Oct 1;159(7):447-55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-7-201310010-00004. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 24081285 Free PMC article.
-
Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit: Incidence, Risk Factors, Resource Use, and Outcomes. A Retrospective Cohort Study.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(8):1312-1319. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201611-851OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017. PMID: 28530118
-
A meta-analysis to derive literature-based benchmarks for readmission and hospital mortality after patient discharge from intensive care.Crit Care. 2014 Dec 31;18(6):715. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0715-6. Crit Care. 2014. PMID: 25551448 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Severity of illness and risk of readmission to intensive care: a meta-analysis.Resuscitation. 2009 May;80(5):505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.02.015. Epub 2009 Apr 1. Resuscitation. 2009. PMID: 19342149 Review.
Cited by
-
Mortality Rates in Early versus Late Intensive Care Unit Readmission.Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;11(2):143-149. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_634_22. Epub 2023 Apr 12. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37252017 Free PMC article.
-
Nursing Activities Score at Discharge from the Intensive Care Unit Is Associated with Unplanned Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit.J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 2;11(17):5203. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175203. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36079134 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of unplanned 30-day readmission for ICU patients with heart failure.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 2;22(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01857-y. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022. PMID: 35501789 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of registry captured indicators for evaluating quality of critical care in ICU.J Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 5;9(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40560-021-00556-6. J Intensive Care. 2021. PMID: 34353360 Free PMC article.
-
A new analytical framework for missing data imputation and classification with uncertainty: Missing data imputation and heart failure readmission prediction.PLoS One. 2020 Sep 21;15(9):e0237724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237724. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32956366 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rhodes A, Moreno RP, Azoulay E, et al. Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:598–605. - PubMed
-
- Society of Critical Care Medicine Quality Indicators Committee. Candidate critical care quality indicators. Anaheim CSoCCM;
-
- de Vos M, Graafmans W, Keesman E, et al. Quality measurement at intensive care units: which indicators should we use? J Crit Care. 2007;22:267–274. - PubMed
-
- Cooper GS, Sirio CA, Rotondi AJ, et al. Are readmissions to the intensive care unit a useful measure of hospital performance? Med Care. 1999;37:399–408. - PubMed
-
- Woodhouse D, Berg M, van der Putten J, et al. Will benchmarking ICUs improve outcome? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15:450–455. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
