Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Sep;132(3):616-622.e7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 24.

Pet exposure and risk of atopic dermatitis at the pediatric age: a meta-analysis of birth cohort studies

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Pet exposure and risk of atopic dermatitis at the pediatric age: a meta-analysis of birth cohort studies

Claudio Pelucchi et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Findings on pet exposure and the risk of atopic dermatitis (AD) in children are inconsistent.

Objective: With the aim to summarize the results of exposure to different pets on AD, we undertook a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on this issue.

Methods: In August 2012, we conducted a systematic literature search in Medline and Embase. We included analytic studies considering exposure to dogs, cats, other pets, or pets overall during pregnancy, infancy, and/or childhood, with AD assessment performed during infancy or childhood. We calculated summary relative risks and 95% CIs using both fixed- and random-effects models. We computed summary estimates across selected subgroups.

Results: Twenty-six publications from 21 birth cohort studies were used in the meta-analyses. The pooled relative risks of AD for exposure versus no exposure were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.61-0.85; I(2) = 46%; results based on 15 studies) for exposure to dogs, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.76-1.16; I(2) = 54%; results based on 13 studies) for exposure to cats, and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.67-0.85; I(2) = 54%; results based on 11 studies) for exposure to pets overall. No heterogeneity emerged across the subgroups examined, except for geographic area.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis reported a favorable effect of exposure to dogs and pets on the risk of AD in infants or children, whereas no association emerged with exposure to cats.

Keywords: AD; Atopic dermatitis; OR; Odds ratio; RR; Relative risk; child; epidemiology; hygiene hypothesis; pets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types