Evaluating the content of the communication items in the CAHPS(®) clinician and group survey and supplemental items with what high-performing physicians say they do
- PMID: 23716167
- DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0016-1
Evaluating the content of the communication items in the CAHPS(®) clinician and group survey and supplemental items with what high-performing physicians say they do
Abstract
Background: A doctor's ability to communicate effectively is key to establishing and maintaining positive doctor-patient relationships. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and System (CAHPS(®)) Clinician and Group Survey is the standard for collecting and reporting information about patients' experiences of care in the USA.
Objective: To evaluate how well CAHPS(®) Clinician and Group 2.0 core and supplemental survey items (CG-CAHPS) with a 12-month reference capture doctor-patient communication.
Data sources/study setting: Eleven of the 40 highest-rated physicians on the CG-CAHPS survey treating patients in a Midwest commercial health plan.
Study design: Data were obtained via semi-structured interviews. Specific behaviors, practices, and opinions about doctor communication were coded and compared to the CG-CAHPS items.
Principal findings: CG-CAHPS fully captures six of the nine behaviors most commonly mentioned by high-performing physicians: employing office staff with good people skills; involving office staff in communication with patients; spending enough time with patients; listening carefully; providing clear, simple explanations; and devising an action plan with each patient. Three physician behaviors identified as key were not captured in CG-CAHPS items: use of nonverbal communication; greeting patients and introducing oneself; and tracking personal information about patients.
Conclusions: CG-CAHPS survey items capture many of the most commonly mentioned doctor-patient communication behaviors and practices identified by high-performing physicians. Nonverbal communication, greeting patients, and tracking personal information about patients were identified as key aspects of doctor-patient communication, but are not captured by the current CG-CAHPS. We recommend further research to assess patients' perceptions of specific verbal and nonverbal behaviors (such as leaning forward in a chair, casually asking about other family members), followed by the development of new items (if needed) that aim to capture what these specific behaviors represent to patients (e.g., listens attentively, seems to care about me as a person, empathy). We also recommend including items about greeting and tracking personal information about patients in future CAHPS item sets addressing doctor-patient communication. Enriching the content of the CAHPS communication measure can help health-care organizations improve doctor-patient communication and interactions.
Similar articles
-
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 25287521 Free PMC article.
-
Some Aspects of Patient Experience Assessed by Practices Undergoing Patient-Centered Medical Home Transformation Are Measured by CAHPS, Others Are Not.Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Oct/Dec;29(4):179-187. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000263. Qual Manag Health Care. 2020. PMID: 32991534 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey.Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(Suppl):S28-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31826cbc0d. Med Care. 2012. PMID: 23064274 Free PMC article.
-
How the CAHPS Clinician and Group Patient Experience Survey Data Have Been Used in Research: A Systematic Review.J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024 Jul 16;11(2):88-96. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.2056. eCollection 2024 Summer. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2024. PMID: 39044849 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of CAHPS® patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative.J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Jul 7;7:41-54. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S69963. eCollection 2015. J Healthc Leadersh. 2015. PMID: 29355183 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Shadow Coaching Improves Patient Experience With Care, But Gains Erode Later.Med Care. 2021 Nov 1;59(11):950-960. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001629. Med Care. 2021. PMID: 34387621 Free PMC article.
-
Experiences With Chiropractic Care for Patients With Low Back or Neck Pain.J Patient Exp. 2020 Jun;7(3):357-364. doi: 10.1177/2374373519846022. Epub 2019 May 31. J Patient Exp. 2020. PMID: 32821795 Free PMC article.
-
Population-Based Pragmatic Trial of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care in the University of California Health System.J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):72-81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0142. J Palliat Med. 2019. PMID: 31486723 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare provider relational quality is associated with better self-management and less treatment burden in people with multiple chronic conditions.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 26;11:1635-1646. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S145942. eCollection 2017. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017. PMID: 29033551 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of health literacy, patient-centered communication and shared decision-making on patients' satisfaction with care received in German primary care practices.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 30;16(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1693-y. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27577702 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
