The rate of subsequent surgery and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: two- and 6-year follow-up results from a multicenter cohort
- PMID: 23722056
- PMCID: PMC4195486
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546513490277
The rate of subsequent surgery and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: two- and 6-year follow-up results from a multicenter cohort
Abstract
Background: Subsequent surgeries have a profound effect on patient satisfaction and outcome after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There have been no prospective studies to date describing the rate and predictors (surgical and patient variables) of all subsequent knee surgeries at short-term and midterm follow-up along with analyses of surgical and patient variables that are associated with subsequent surgeries.
Purpose: To report the rate and predictors of all subsequent surgeries at short-term and midterm follow-up along with associated patient variables.
Study design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods: A total of 980 patients (540 male) were prospectively enrolled in a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort from January 2002 to December 2003. The 2- and 6-year follow-up information for subsequent procedures was obtained. Operative reports were obtained, and all procedures were categorized.
Results: One hundred eighty-five patients underwent a subsequent surgery on the ipsilateral leg (18.9%) and 100 on the contralateral knee (10.2%) at 6-year follow-up. On the ipsilateral knee, there was a 7.7% rate of ACL revisions, a 13.3% rate of cartilage procedures, a 5.4% rate of arthrofibrosis procedures, and a 2.4% rate of procedures related to hardware. For the contralateral knee, there was a 6.4% rate of primary ACL ruptures. Younger age at the index surgery and the use of allografts were predictors (risk factors) for subsequent surgery. Revision ACLR, female sex, body mass index, and surgical exposure were not significant predictors.
Conclusion: At 6-year follow-up, 18.9% of patients who had undergone ACLR underwent subsequent surgeries on the ipsilateral knee. The rates between an ipsilateral ACLR graft versus a contralateral normal ACL tear were similar (7.7% vs 6.4%, respectively). Younger age and the use of allografts were risk factors for subsequent surgery.
Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; subsequent surgery.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Subsequent Surgery After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Rates and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Cohort.Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2068-2076. doi: 10.1177/0363546517707207. Epub 2017 May 30. Am J Sports Med. 2017. PMID: 28557557 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in High School and College-Aged Athletes: Does Autograft Choice Influence Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Rates?Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):298-309. doi: 10.1177/0363546519892991. Epub 2020 Jan 9. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 31917613 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors of subsequent operations after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):619-25. doi: 10.1177/0363546513511416. Epub 2013 Dec 13. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 24335588
-
Ten-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(4):815-825. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749850. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29543512 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and Predictors of Subsequent Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 6-Year Follow-up Study.Am J Sports Med. 2020 Aug;48(10):2418-2428. doi: 10.1177/0363546520935867. Am J Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 32736502 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of retear rates following transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Functional outcomes and GNRB assessment with a mean 6.3 follow-up.J Orthop. 2024 Oct 10;62:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.015. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39507950
-
The significance of guiding anterior cruciate ligament revision: a modified femoral tunnel classification.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 16;25(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07866-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. PMID: 39285360 Free PMC article.
-
Complex Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Achilles Tendon Allograft: The "Monoloop" Technique.Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Dec 18;13(6):102826. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.09.002. eCollection 2024 Jun. Arthrosc Tech. 2023. PMID: 39036402 Free PMC article.
-
Various Definitions of Failure Are Used in Studies of Patients Who Underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep 22;5(6):100801. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100801. eCollection 2023 Dec. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 37766857 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk Factors and Outcomes for Preoperative Stiffness Requiring Intervention Before Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jul 12;11(7):23259671231181371. doi: 10.1177/23259671231181371. eCollection 2023 Jul. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37457045 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, Andrews M. A rigorous comparison between the sexes of results and complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(4):514–526. - PubMed
-
- Barker JU, Drakos MC, Maak TG, Warren RF, Williams RJ, 3rd, Allen AA. Effect of graft selection on the incidence of postoperative infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):281–286. - PubMed
-
- Benner RW, Shelbourne KD, Freeman H. Infections and patellar tendon ruptures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of ipsilateral and contralateral patellar tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(3):519–525. - PubMed
-
- Cox JS, Lenz HW. Women midshipmen in sports. Am J Sports Med. 1984;12(3):241–243. - PubMed
-
- Dunn WR, Lyman S, Lincoln AE, Amoroso PJ, Wickiewicz T, Marx RG. The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(8):1906–1914. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
