B95: a new respirator for health care personnel
- PMID: 23726655
- PMCID: PMC7115300
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.03.293
B95: a new respirator for health care personnel
Abstract
Background: Respiratory protection relies heavily on user compliance to be effective, but compliance among health care personnel is less than ideal.
Methods: In 2008, the Department of Veterans Affairs formed the Project Better Respiratory Equipment using Advanced Technologies for Healthcare Employees (BREATHE) Working Group, composed of a variety of federal stakeholders, to discuss strategies for improving respirator compliance, including the need for more comfortable respirators.
Results: The Working Group developed 28 desirable performance characteristics that can be grouped into 4 key themes: (1) respirators should perform their intended function safely and effectively; (2) respirators should support, not interfere, with occupational activities; (3) respirators should be comfortable and tolerable for the duration of wear; and (4) respiratory protective programs should comply with federal/state standards and guidelines and local policies. As a necessary next step, the Working Group identified the need for a new class of respirators, to be called "B95," which would better address the unique needs of health care personnel.
Conclusion: This article summarizes the outputs of the Project BREATHE Working Group and provides a national strategy to develop clinically validated respirator test methods, to promulgate B95 respirator standards, and to invent novel design features, which together will lead to commercialized B95 respirators.
Keywords: Infection control; N95; Occupational health; Personal protective equipment; Respiratory protection.
Published by Mosby, Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of 9 health care organizations' respiratory protection programs and respiratory protective device practices: Implications for adoption of elastomerics.Am J Infect Control. 2018 Mar;46(3):350-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Am J Infect Control. 2018. PMID: 29079137
-
Special article: personal protective equipment for care of pandemic influenza patients: a training workshop for the powered air purifying respirator.Anesth Analg. 2010 Oct;111(4):933-45. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e780f8. Epub 2010 Sep 1. Anesth Analg. 2010. PMID: 20810676
-
Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Mar;14(3):175-179. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1237030. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017. PMID: 27717300
-
Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13;65(11):1934-1942. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix681. Clin Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 29140516 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the rationale for concurrent use of N95 filtering facepiece respirators with loose-fitting powered air-purifying respirators during aerosol-generating medical procedures.Am J Infect Control. 2008 Mar;36(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.04.284. Am J Infect Control. 2008. PMID: 18313516 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Speech intelligibility in respiratory protective equipment - Implications for verbal communication in critical care.Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2021 Feb;36:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.tacc.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 15. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 38620262 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Face masks to fight against COVID-19 pandemics: A comprehensive review of materials, design, technology and product development.J Ind Text. 2022 Jun;51(3 Suppl):3613S-3647S. doi: 10.1177/15280837211069869. J Ind Text. 2022. PMID: 38603152 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of N95 respirators on fit rate, real-time leakage, and usability among Chinese healthcare workers: study protocol of a randomized crossover trial.Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 17;11:1266607. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1266607. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 38045983 Free PMC article.
-
Project BREATHE - Prototype Respirator Evaluation Utilizing Newly Proposed Respirator Test Criteria.J Int Soc Respir Prot. 2017 Jun 30;34(1):1-9. J Int Soc Respir Prot. 2017. PMID: 37207040 Free PMC article.
-
Innovate and Stockpile: Respiratory Protection for Essential Workers in a Catastrophic Pandemic.Health Secur. 2023 Jul-Aug;21(4):266-271. doi: 10.1089/hs.2022.0126. Epub 2023 May 17. Health Secur. 2023. PMID: 37196202 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Sammer C.E., Lykens K., Singh K.P., Mains D.A., Lackan N.A. What is patient safety culture? A review of the literature. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010;42:156–165. - PubMed
-
- Wise M.E., De Perio M., Halpin J., Jhung M., Magill S., Black S.R. Transmission of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza to healthcare personnel. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:S198–S204. - PubMed
-
- American Thoracic Society Respiratory protection guidelines. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:1153–1165. - PubMed
-
- Birkner J.S., Colton C.E. Respiratory protective equipment. Patty's Industrial Hygiene. 2011:1169–1233.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
