Use of aquaculture ponds and other habitats by autumn migrating shorebirds along the lower Mississippi river
- PMID: 23733250
- DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0087-8
Use of aquaculture ponds and other habitats by autumn migrating shorebirds along the lower Mississippi river
Abstract
Populations of many shorebird species are declining; habitat loss and degradation are among the leading causes for these declines. Shorebirds use a variety of habitats along interior migratory routes including managed moist soil units, natural wetlands, sandbars, and agricultural lands such as harvested rice fields. Less well known is shorebird use of freshwater aquaculture facilities, such as commercial cat- and crayfish ponds. We compared shorebird habitat use at drained aquaculture ponds, moist soil units, agricultural areas, sandbars and other natural habitat, and a sewage treatment facility in the in the lower Mississippi River Alluvial Valley (LMAV) during autumn 2009. Six species: Least Sandpiper (Calidris minutilla), Killdeer (Charadrius vociferous), Semipalmated Sandpiper (Calidris pusilla), Pectoral Sandpiper (C. melanotos), Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus himantopus), and Lesser Yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes), accounted for 92 % of the 31,165 individuals observed. Sewage settling lagoons (83.4, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 25.3-141.5 birds/ha), drained aquaculture ponds (33.5, 95 % CI 22.4-44.6 birds/ha), and managed moist soil units on public lands (15.7, CI 11.2-20.3 birds/ha) had the highest estimated densities of shorebirds. The estimated 1,100 ha of drained aquaculture ponds available during autumn 2009 provided over half of the estimated requirement of 2,000 ha by the LMAV Joint Venture working group. However, because of the decline in the aquaculture industry, autumn shorebird habitats in the LMAV may be limited in the near future. Recognition of the current aquaculture habitat trends will be important to the future management activities of federal and state agencies. Should these aquaculture habitat trends continue, there may be a need for wildlife biologists to investigate other habitats that can be managed to offset the current and expected loss of aquaculture acreages. This study illustrates the potential for freshwater aquaculture to provide habitat for a taxa at risk. With the rapid growth of aquaculture worldwide, the practices of this industry deserve attention to identify benefits as well as risks to wildlife.
Similar articles
-
Foraging ecology of fall-migrating shorebirds in the Illinois River valley.PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045121. Epub 2012 Sep 18. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23028795 Free PMC article.
-
Shorebird use of coastal wetland and barrier island habitat in the Gulf of Mexico.ScientificWorldJournal. 2002 Feb 27;2:514-36. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2002.112. ScientificWorldJournal. 2002. PMID: 12806034 Free PMC article.
-
The importance of supratidal habitats for wintering shorebirds and the potential impacts of shrimp aquaculture.Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;43(6):1108-21. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9255-7. Epub 2009 Feb 3. Environ Manage. 2009. PMID: 19189172
-
Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 May;81(2):163-82. doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950. Epub 2005 Dec 12. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006. PMID: 16336747 Review.
-
Intake rates and the functional response in shorebirds (Charadriiformes) eating macro-invertebrates.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 Nov;81(4):501-29. doi: 10.1017/S1464793106007093. Epub 2006 Jul 24. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006. PMID: 16863594 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
