N-acetylcysteine plus intravenous fluids versus intravenous fluids alone to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in emergency computed tomography
- PMID: 23769807
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.04.012
N-acetylcysteine plus intravenous fluids versus intravenous fluids alone to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in emergency computed tomography
Abstract
Study objective: We test the hypothesis that N-acetylcysteine plus normal saline solution is more effective than normal saline solution alone in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy.
Methods: The design was a randomized, double blind, 2-center, placebo-controlled interventional trial. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing chest, abdominal, or pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan with intravenous contrast, older than 18 years, and at least one contrast-induced nephropathy risk factor. Exclusion criteria were end-stage renal disease, pregnancy, N-acetylcysteine allergy, or clinical instability. Intervention for the treatment group was N-acetylcysteine 3 g in 500 mL normal saline solution as an intravenous bolus and then 200 mg/hour (67 mL/hour) for up to 24 hours; and for the placebo group was 500 mL normal saline solution and then 67 mL/hour for up to 24 hours. The primary outcome was contrast-induced nephropathy, defined as an increase in creatinine level of 25% or 0.5 mg/dL, measured 48 to 72 hours after CT.
Results: The data safety and monitoring board terminated the study early for futility. Of 399 patients enrolled, 357 (89%) completed follow-up and were included. The N-acetylcysteine plus saline solution group contrast-induced nephropathy rate was 14 of 185 (7.6%) versus 12 of 172 (7.0%) in the normal saline solution only group (absolute risk difference 0.6%; 95% confidence interval -4.8% to 6.0%). The contrast-induced nephropathy rate in patients receiving less than 1 L intravenous fluids in the emergency department (ED) was 19 of 147 (12.9%) versus 7 of 210 (3.3%) for greater than 1 L intravenous fluids (difference 9.6%; 95% confidence interval 3.7% to 15.5%), a 69% risk reduction (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.80) per liter of intravenous fluids.
Conclusion: We did not find evidence of a benefit for N-acetylcysteine administration to our ED patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT. However, we did find a significant association between volume of intravenous fluids administered and reduction in contrast-induced nephropathy.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of short-term infusion regimens of N-acetylcysteine plus intravenous fluids, sodium bicarbonate plus intravenous fluids, and intravenous fluids alone for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in the emergency department.Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(6):615-22. doi: 10.1111/acem.12400. Acad Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 25039544 Clinical Trial.
-
Sodium bicarbonate plus isotonic saline versus saline for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Oct;54(4):610-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.05.016. Epub 2009 Jul 19. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009. PMID: 19619921 Clinical Trial.
-
Sodium bicarbonate therapy for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Apr;53(4):617-27. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.08.033. Epub 2008 Nov 22. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009. PMID: 19027212 Review.
-
Sodium bicarbonate, N-acetylcysteine, and saline for prevention of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy. A comparison of 3 regimens for protecting contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary procedures. A single-center prospective controlled trial.Am Heart J. 2007 Sep;154(3):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.05.012. Am Heart J. 2007. PMID: 17719303 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of Prevention Strategies for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 15;164(6):406-16. doi: 10.7326/M15-1456. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Ann Intern Med. 2016. PMID: 26830221 Review.
Cited by
-
N-acetylcysteine in Kidney Disease: Molecular Mechanisms, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Effectiveness.Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Jul 20;9(10):2883-2903. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.07.020. eCollection 2024 Oct. Kidney Int Rep. 2024. PMID: 39430194 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of N-acetylcysteine for preventing post-intravenous contrast acute kidney injury in patients with kidney impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2023 Sep;33(9):6569-6581. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09577-1. Epub 2023 Apr 18. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37071164 Review.
-
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pretreatment With Intravenous Fluid in Reducing the Risk of Developing Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2022 May 8;14(5):e24825. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24825. eCollection 2022 May. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35693368 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contrast associated nephropathy after intravenous administration: what is the magnitude of the problem?Ren Fail. 2021 Dec;43(1):1311-1321. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1978490. Ren Fail. 2021. PMID: 34547972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guideline on the use of iodinated contrast media in patients with kidney disease 2018.Jpn J Radiol. 2020 Jan;38(1):3-46. doi: 10.1007/s11604-019-00850-2. Jpn J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 31709498 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
