Evaluation of a center of excellence program for spine surgery
- PMID: 23774514
- PMCID: PMC4091772
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b091d
Evaluation of a center of excellence program for spine surgery
Abstract
Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and many private health plans are encouraging patients to seek orthopedic care at hospitals designated as centers of excellence. No evaluations have been conducted to compare patient outcomes and costs at centers of excellence versus other hospitals. The objective of our study was to assess whether hospitals designated as spine surgery centers of excellence by a group of over 25 health plans provided higher quality care.
Methods: Claims representing approximately 54 million commercially insured individuals were used to identify individuals aged 18-64 years with 1 of 3 types of spine surgery in 2007-2009: 1-level or 2-level cervical fusion (referred to as cervical simple fusion), 1-level or 2-level lumbar fusion (referred to as lumbar simple fusion), or lumbar discectomy and/or decompression without fusion. The primary outcomes were any complication (7 complications were captured) and 30-day readmission. The multivariate models controlled for differences in age, sex, and comorbidities between the 2 sets of hospitals.
Results: A total of 29,295 cervical simple fusions, 27,214 lumbar simple fusions, and 28,911 lumbar discectomy/decompressions were identified, of which 42%, 42%, and 47%, respectively, were performed at a hospital designated as a spine surgery center of excellence. Designated hospitals had a larger number of beds and were more likely to be an academic center. Across the 3 types of spine surgery (cervical fusions, lumbar fusions, or lumbar discectomies/decompressions), there was no difference in the composite complication rate [OR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.72-1.12); OR 0.98 (95% CI, 0.85-1.13); OR 0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-1.07), respectively] or readmission rate [OR 1.03 (95% CI, 0.87-1.21); OR 1.01 (95% CI, 0.89-1.13); OR 0.91 (95%, CI 0.79-1.04), respectively] at designated hospitals compared with other hospitals.
Conclusions: On average, spine surgery centers of excellence had similar complication rates and readmission rates compared with other hospitals. These results highlight the importance of empirical evaluations of centers of excellence programs.
Similar articles
-
Value Defects in Spine Surgery: How to Reduce Wasteful Care and Improve Value.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Sep 15;32(18):833-839. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00989. Epub 2024 May 24. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024. PMID: 39240706 Review.
-
Finding the Value in 'Value' Designation: Evidence and Opportunity in the United States.Manag Care. 2016 Nov;25(11):36-42. Manag Care. 2016. PMID: 28121612
-
Evaluation of centers of excellence program for knee and hip replacement.Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):28-36. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182699407. Med Care. 2013. PMID: 23222470 Free PMC article.
-
Establishing benchmarks for the volume-outcome relationship for common lumbar spine surgical procedures.Spine J. 2018 Jan;18(1):22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.263. Epub 2017 Sep 5. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 28887272
-
Best practices guidelines in the postoperative management of patients who underwent cervical and lumbar fusions.J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 23;10(3):514-520. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-136. Epub 2024 Jul 18. J Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 39399069 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Value Defects in Spine Surgery: How to Reduce Wasteful Care and Improve Value.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Sep 15;32(18):833-839. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00989. Epub 2024 May 24. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024. PMID: 39240706 Review.
-
Spine centers of excellence: a systematic review and single-institution description of a spine center of excellence.J Spine Surg. 2022 Mar;8(1):44-53. doi: 10.21037/jss-21-46. J Spine Surg. 2022. PMID: 35441105 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Conceptualising centres of excellence: a scoping review of global evidence.BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e050419. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050419. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35131819 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Heartburn Center Set-Up in a Community Setting: Engineering and Execution.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 10;8:662007. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.662007. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34858998 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of hospital safety-net status on inpatient outcomes for brain tumor craniotomy: a 10-year nationwide analysis.Neurooncol Adv. 2020 Dec 1;3(1):vdaa167. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa167. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Neurooncol Adv. 2020. PMID: 33506205 Free PMC article.
References
-
-
Aetna: Aetna Institutes. Edited.
-
-
- AHRQ. AHRQ Inpatient Quality Indicators. Laminectomy or Spinal Fusion Area Rate. 2009.
-
- Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. Jama. 2002;288(16):1987–93. - PubMed
-
- Alberts MJ, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers. Brain Attack Coalition. JAMA. 2000;283(23):3102–9. - PubMed
-
- Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, Johanson JF, Greenlaw RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(24):2533–41. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
