Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 22;173(14):1328-35.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6633.

Changes in Red Meat Consumption and Subsequent Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Three Cohorts of US Men and Women

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Changes in Red Meat Consumption and Subsequent Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Three Cohorts of US Men and Women

An Pan et al. JAMA Intern Med. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Importance: Red meat consumption has been consistently associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, whether changes in red meat intake are related to subsequent T2DM risk remains unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the association between changes in red meat consumption during a 4-year period and subsequent 4-year risk of T2DM in US adults.

Design and setting: Three prospective cohort studies in US men and women.

Participants: We followed up 26,357 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2006), 48,709 women in the Nurses' Health Study (1986-2006), and 74,077 women in the Nurses' Health Study II (1991-2007). Diet was assessed by validated food frequency questionnaires and updated every 4 years. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios with adjustment for age, family history, race, marital status, initial red meat consumption, smoking status, and initial and changes in other lifestyle factors (physical activity, alcohol intake, total energy intake, and diet quality). Results across cohorts were pooled by an inverse variance-weighted, fixed-effect meta-analysis.

Main outcomes and measures: Incident T2DM cases validated by supplementary questionnaires.

Results: During 1,965,824 person-years of follow-up, we documented 7540 incident T2DM cases. In the multivariate-adjusted models, increasing red meat intake during a 4-year interval was associated with an elevated risk of T2DM during the subsequent 4 years in each cohort (all P < .001 for trend). Compared with the reference group of no change in red meat intake, increasing red meat intake of more than 0.50 servings per day was associated with a 48% (pooled hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.37-1.59) elevated risk in the subsequent 4-year period, and the association was modestly attenuated after further adjustment for initial body mass index and concurrent weight gain (1.30; 95% CI, 1.21-1.41). Reducing red meat consumption by more than 0.50 servings per day from baseline to the first 4 years of follow-up was associated with a 14% (pooled hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93) lower risk during the subsequent entire follow-up through 2006 or 2007.

Conclusions and relevance: Increasing red meat consumption over time is associated with an elevated subsequent risk of T2DM, and the association is partly mediated by body weight. Our results add further evidence that limiting red meat consumption over time confers benefits for T2DM prevention.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: None of the authors had any financial or personal conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hazard ratios of type 2 diabetes according to updated 4-year changes in total red meat intake
The low intake level was defined as <2 servings/wk, and moderate intake level was defined as 2–6 servings/wk, and high intake level was defined as ≥7 servings/wk. The reference group (hazard ratio=1.00) was the low intake level both at initial and 4-y later follow-up visit. The analysis adjusted for age, race (white, non-white), marital status (with spouse, yes or not), family history of diabetes (yes or not), history of hypertension (yes or not), history of hypercholesterolemia (yes or not), and simultaneous changes in other lifestyle factors: smoking status (never to never, never to current, past to past, past to current, current to past, current to current, missing indicator), initial and change in alcohol intake (quintiles), initial and change in physical activity (quintiles), initial and change in total energy intake (quintiles), as well as initial and change in diet quality (Alternative Healthy Eating Index, quintiles). Among nurses, postmenopausal status and menopausal hormone use (NHS and NHS II) were also included. The results across the three cohorts were pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 60 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

Feedback