Translating comparative effectiveness of depression medications into practice by comparing the depression medication choice decision aid to usual care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 23782672
- PMCID: PMC3663744
- DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-127
Translating comparative effectiveness of depression medications into practice by comparing the depression medication choice decision aid to usual care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) documents important differences in antidepressants in terms of efficacy, safety, cost, and burden to the patient. Decision aids can adapt this evidence to help patients participate in making informed choices. In turn, antidepressant therapy will more likely reflect patients' values and context, leading to improved adherence and mood outcomes.
Methods/design: The objective of this study is to develop the Depression Medication Choice decision aid for use during primary care encounters, and to test its efficacy by conducting a clustered practical randomized trial comparing the decision aid to usual depression care in primary care practices.We will use a novel practice-based, patient-centered approach based on participatory action research that involves a multidisciplinary team of designers, investigators, clinicians, patient representatives, and other stakeholders for the development of the decision aid. We will then conduct a clustered practical randomized trial enrolling clinicians and their patients (n = 300) with moderate to severe depression from rural, suburban and inner city primary care practices (n = 10). The intervention will consist of the use of the depression medication choice decision aid during the clinical encounter. This trial will generate preliminary evidence of the relative impact of the decision aid on patient involvement in decision making, decision making quality, patient knowledge, and 6-month measures of medication adherence and mental health compared to usual depression care.
Discussion: Upon completion of the proposed research, we will have developed and evaluated the efficacy of the decision aid depression medication choice as a novel translational tool for CER in depression treatment, engaged patients with depression in their care, and refined the process by which we conduct practice-based trials with limited research footprint.
Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01502891.
Similar articles
-
Shared Decision Making for Antidepressants in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1761-70. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5214. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26414670 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of decision aids to enhance shared decision making for diabetes (the DAD study): protocol of a cluster randomized trial.BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 28;12:130. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-130. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22640439 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The effects of using the PReDicT Test to guide the antidepressant treatment of depressed patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2017 Nov 23;18(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2247-2. Trials. 2017. PMID: 29169399 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28;(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5. PMID: 24470076 Updated. Review.
-
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28;(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4. PMID: 21975733 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of analog and digital patient decision aids for the treatment of depression: a scoping review.Front Digit Health. 2023 Sep 1;5:1208889. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1208889. eCollection 2023. Front Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37744684 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36367232 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Cost Conversation on Decision-Making Outcomes.Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jun 12;5(4):802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.05.006. eCollection 2021 Aug. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021. PMID: 34401656 Free PMC article.
-
Using Shared Decision-Making Tools and Patient-Clinician Conversations About Costs.Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020 Aug 5;4(4):416-423. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.04.013. eCollection 2020 Aug. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32793869 Free PMC article.
-
Phase II Randomised Controlled Trial of a patient decision-aid website to improve treatment decision-making for young adults with bipolar II disorder: A feasibility study protocol.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Nov 9;12:137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.11.004. eCollection 2018 Dec. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018. PMID: 30456328 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blazer DG, Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Swartz MS. The prevalence and distribution of major depression in a national community sample: the National Comorbidity Survey. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151(7):979–986. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
