Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):146-53.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001851. Epub 2013 Jun 20.

Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care

Nerissa S Bauer  1 , Aaron E Carroll, Stephen M Downs
Affiliations

Understanding the acceptability of a computer decision support system in pediatric primary care

Nerissa S Bauer et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Individual users' attitudes and opinions help predict successful adoption of health information technology (HIT) into practice; however, little is known about pediatric users' acceptance of HIT for medical decision-making at the point of care.

Materials and methods: We wished to examine the attitudes and opinions of pediatric users' toward the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system, a computer decision support system linked to an electronic health record in four community pediatric clinics. Surveys were administered in 2011 and 2012 to all users to measure CHICA's acceptability and users' satisfaction with it. Free text comments were analyzed for themes to understand areas of potential technical refinement.

Results: 70 participants completed the survey in 2011 (100% response rate) and 64 of 66 (97% response rate) in 2012. Initially, satisfaction with CHICA was mixed. In general, users felt the system held promise; however various critiques reflected difficulties understanding integrated technical aspects of how CHICA worked, as well as concern with the format and wording on generated forms for families and users. In the subsequent year, users' ratings reflected improved satisfaction and acceptance. Comments also reflected a deeper understanding of the system's logic, often accompanied by suggestions on potential refinements to make CHICA more useful at the point of care.

Conclusions: Pediatric users appreciate the system's automation and enhancements that allow relevant and meaningful clinical data to be accessible at point of care. Understanding users' acceptability and satisfaction is critical for ongoing refinement of HIT to ensure successful adoption into practice.

Keywords: Clinical guidelines; Computer-based decision support; Pediatrics; Primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) pre-screener form.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sample Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) physician worksheet.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Menachemi N, Ettel DL, Brooks RG, et al. Charting the use of electronic health records and other information technologies among child health providers. BMC Pediatr 2006;6:21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kemper AR, Uren RL, Clark SJ. Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices. Pediatrics 2006;118:e20–4 - PubMed
    1. Leu MG, O'Connor KG, Marshall R, et al. Pediatricians’ use of health information technology: a national survey. Pediatrics 2012;130:e1441–6 - PubMed
    1. Epstein JN, Langberg JM, Lichtenstein PK, et al. Use of an internet portal to improve community-based pediatric ADHD care: a cluster randomized trial. Pediatrics 2011;128:e1201–8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lavigne JV, Dulcan MK, LeBailly SA, et al. Computer-assisted management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics 2011;128:e46–53 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types