Memorial Hermann: high reliability from board to bedside
- PMID: 23789162
- DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39034-5
Memorial Hermann: high reliability from board to bedside
Abstract
Background: In 2006 the Memorial Hermann Health System (MHHS), which includes 12 hospitals, began applying principles embraced by high reliability organizations (HROs). Three factors support its HRO journey: (1) aligned organizational structure with transparent management systems and compressed reporting processes; (2) Robust Process Improvement (RPI) with high-reliability interventions; and (3) cultural establishment, sustainment, and evolution.
Methods: The Quality and Safety strategic plan contains three domains, each with a specific set of measures that provide goals for performance: (1) "Clinical Excellence;" (2) "Do No Harm;" and (3) "Saving Lives," as measured by the Serious Safety Event rate. MHHS uses a uniform approach to performance improvement--RPI, which includes Six Sigma, Lean, and change management, to solve difficult safety and quality problems.
Results: The 9 acute care hospitals provide multiple opportunities to integrate high-reliability interventions and best practices across MHHS. For example, MHHS partnered with the Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare in its inaugural project to establish reliable hand hygiene behaviors, which improved MHHS's average hand hygiene compliance rate from 44% to 92% currently. Soon after compliance exceeded 85% at all 12 hospitals, the average rate of central line-associated bloodstream and ventilator-associated pneumonias decreased to essentially zero.
Conclusion: MHHS's size and diversity require a disciplined approach to performance improvement and systemwide achievement of measurable success. The most significant cultural change at MHHS has been the expectation for 100% compliance with evidence-based quality measures and 0% incidence of patient harm.
Similar articles
-
Using the Targeted Solutions Tool® to Improve Hand Hygiene Compliance Is Associated with Decreased Health Care-Associated Infections.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Jan;42(1):6-17. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42001-5. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016. PMID: 26685929
-
The Vidant Health quality transformation.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 May;40(5):212-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40028-x. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014. PMID: 24919252
-
Applying the High Reliability Health Care Maturity Model to Assess Hospital Performance: A VA Case Study.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Sep;42(9):389-411. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42080-5. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016. PMID: 27535456
-
Preventing Harm in the ICU-Building a Culture of Safety and Engaging Patients and Families.Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1531-1537. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002556. Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28640023 Review.
-
Effective quality systems: implementation in Australian public hospitals.Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Oct 8;31(8):1044-1057. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-02-2017-0037. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018. PMID: 30415611 Review.
Cited by
-
A qualitative analysis of hospital leaders' opinions about publicly reported measures of health care quality.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Apr;41(4):169-76. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41022-0. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015. PMID: 25977201 Free PMC article.
-
High-reliability health care: getting there from here.Milbank Q. 2013 Sep;91(3):459-90. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12023. Milbank Q. 2013. PMID: 24028696 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
