Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S22-9.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1e2c.

Data quality assessment for comparative effectiveness research in distributed data networks

Jeffrey S Brown  1 , Michael Kahn, Sengwee Toh
Affiliations

Data quality assessment for comparative effectiveness research in distributed data networks

Jeffrey S Brown et al. Med Care. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Electronic health information routinely collected during health care delivery and reimbursement can help address the need for evidence about the real-world effectiveness, safety, and quality of medical care. Often, distributed networks that combine information from multiple sources are needed to generate this real-world evidence.

Objective: We provide a set of field-tested best practices and a set of recommendations for data quality checking for comparative effectiveness research (CER) in distributed data networks.

Methods: Explore the requirements for data quality checking and describe data quality approaches undertaken by several existing multi-site networks.

Results: There are no established standards regarding how to evaluate the quality of electronic health data for CER within distributed networks. Data checks of increasing complexity are often used, ranging from consistency with syntactic rules to evaluation of semantics and consistency within and across sites. Temporal trends within and across sites are widely used, as are checks of each data refresh or update. Rates of specific events and exposures by age group, sex, and month are also common.

Discussion: Secondary use of electronic health data for CER holds promise but is complex, especially in distributed data networks that incorporate periodic data refreshes. The viability of a learning health system is dependent on a robust understanding of the quality, validity, and optimal secondary uses of routinely collected electronic health data within distributed health data networks. Robust data quality checking can strengthen confidence in findings based on distributed data network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of change in monthly enrollment for 2 sites
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of change in monthly encounters across two subsequent data extractions
Figure 3
Figure 3
Individuals with one more laboratory test results per 1,000 enrollees: Example of two different laboratory tests
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research Report to the President and Congress. 2009 Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/cerannualrpt.pdf. - PubMed
    1. McClellan M. Drug safety reform at the FDA--pendulum swing or systematic improvement? N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1700–1702. - PubMed
    1. Alina Baciu KS, Sheila P, Burke, editors. The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies; Washington, D.C.: 2006.
    1. Behrman RE, Benner JS, Brown JS, et al. Developing the Sentinel System--a national resource for evidence development. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:498–499. - PubMed
    1. Platt R, Wilson M, Chan KA, et al. The New Sentinel Network - Improving the Evidence of Medical-Product Safety. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:645–647. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms