Correlates of repeat lipid testing in patients with coronary heart disease
- PMID: 23817669
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8198
Correlates of repeat lipid testing in patients with coronary heart disease
Abstract
Importance: Understanding the frequency and correlates of redundant lipid testing could identify areas for quality improvement initiatives aimed at improving the efficiency of cholesterol care in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).
Objective: To determine the frequency and correlates of repeat lipid testing in patients with CHD who attained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals and received no treatment intensification.
Design, setting, and participants: We assessed the proportion of patients with LDL-C levels of less than 100 mg/dL and no intensification of lipid-lowering therapy who underwent repeat lipid testing during an 11-month follow-up period. We performed logistic regression analyses to evaluate facility, provider, and patient characteristics associated with repeat testing. In total, we analyzed 35,191 patients with CHD in a Veterans Affairs network of 7 medical centers with associated community-based outpatient clinics.
Main outcomes and measures: Frequency and correlates of repeat lipid testing in patients having CHD with LDL-C levels of less than 100 mg/dL and no further treatment intensification with lipid-lowering therapies.
Results: Of 27,947 patients with LDL-C levels of less than 100 mg/dL, 9200 (32.9%) had additional lipid assessments without treatment intensification during the following 11 months (12 ,686 total additional panels; mean, 1.38 additional panel per patient). Adjusting for facility-level clustering, patients with a history of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22), a history of hypertension (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.13-1.30), higher illness burden (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.23-1.57), and more frequent primary care visits (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.25-1.39) were more likely to undergo repeat testing, whereas patients receiving care at a teaching facility (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69-0.80) or from a physician provider (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98) and those with a medication possession ratio of 0.8 or higher (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71-0.80) were less likely to undergo repeat testing. Among 13,114 patients who met the optional LDL-C target level of less than 70 mg/dL, repeat lipid testing was performed in 8177 (62.4% of those with LDL-C levels of <70 mg/dL) during 11 follow-up months.
Conclusions and relevance: One-third of patients having CHD with LDL-C levels at goal underwent repeat lipid panels. Our results highlight areas for quality improvement initiatives to reduce redundant lipid testing. These efforts would be more important if the forthcoming cholesterol guidelines adopt a medication dose-based approach in place of the current treat-to-target approach.
Comment in
-
The problem of overuse.JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Aug 12;173(15):1446. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8421. JAMA Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23817453 No abstract available.
-
Physician performance measurement: the importance of understanding physician behavior.JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Aug 12;173(15):1444-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6808. JAMA Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 24141974 No abstract available.
-
Decrease the incentives to order lipid panels.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):473. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12872. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24590082 No abstract available.
-
Decrease the incentives to order lipid panels--reply.JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar;174(3):473-4. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12842. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24590083 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Frequency and correlates of treatment intensification for elevated cholesterol levels in patients with cardiovascular disease.Am Heart J. 2011 Oct;162(4):725-732.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Aug 25. Am Heart J. 2011. PMID: 21982666
-
LDL-C goal attainment among patients newly diagnosed with coronary heart disease or diabetes in a commercial HMO.J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Oct;13(8):652-63. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.8.652. J Manag Care Pharm. 2007. PMID: 17970603 Free PMC article.
-
The control of dyslipidemia in outpatient clinics in Greece (OLYMPIC) Study.Angiology. 2005 Nov-Dec;56(6):731-41. doi: 10.1177/000331970505600611. Angiology. 2005. PMID: 16327950
-
[Lowering LDL cholesterol. How much is enough?].Internist (Berl). 2007 Mar;48(3):319-26. doi: 10.1007/s00108-007-1810-4. Internist (Berl). 2007. PMID: 17333056 Review. German.
-
Lipid lowering and beyond: results from the CARE study on lipoproteins and inflammation. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events.Herz. 1999 Feb;24(1):51-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03043818. Herz. 1999. PMID: 10093013 Review.
Cited by
-
How do general practitioners put preventive care recommendations into practice? A cross-sectional study in Switzerland and France.BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e017958. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017958. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28988186 Free PMC article.
-
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25. Circulation. 2017. PMID: 28122885 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Relationship between cardiovascular risk and lipid testing in one health care system: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 23;15:281. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0884-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 26201968 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
