Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul-Aug;13(4):340-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.005.

Assessing the impact of a web-based comprehensive somatic and mental health screening tool in pediatric primary care

Affiliations

Assessing the impact of a web-based comprehensive somatic and mental health screening tool in pediatric primary care

Kate E Fothergill et al. Acad Pediatr. 2013 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate how parents and physicians perceive the utility of a comprehensive, electronic previsit screener, and to assess its impact on the visit.

Methods: A mixed methods design was used. English-speaking parents were recruited from 3 primary care systems (urban MD and rural NY and VT) when they presented for a well-child visit with a child 4 to 10 years of age. Parents completed an electronic previsit screen, which included somatic concerns, health risks, and 4 mental health tools (SCARED5, PHQ-2, SDQ Impact, and PSC-17). Parents completed an exit survey, and a subset were interviewed. All primary care providers (PCPs) were interviewed.

Results: A total of 120 parents and 16 PCPs participated. The exit surveys showed that nearly 90% of parents agreed or strongly agreed that the screener was easy to use and maintained confidentiality. During interviews, parents noted that the screener helped with recall, validated concerns, reframed issues they thought might not be appropriate for primary care, and raised new questions. PCPs thought that the screener enabled them to normalize sensitive issues, and it permitted them to simultaneously focus and be comprehensive during the visit. Parents and PCPs agreed that the screener helped guide discussion, promoted in-depth exchange, and increased efficiency. Findings were consistent across quantitative and qualitative methods and between parents and PCPs.

Conclusions: A comprehensive electronic previsit screening tool is an acceptable and practical strategy to facilitate well-child visits. It may help with problem identification as well as with setting agendas, engaging the family, and balancing attention between somatic and psychosocial concerns.

Keywords: child mental health; doctor–patient communication; patient engagement; screening; well-child visit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest and corporate sponsors: NONE

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screener Skip Pattern and Responses for Select items

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bingham RL, Plante DA, Bronson DL, Tufo HM, McKnight K. Establishing a quality improvement process for identification of psychosocial problems in a primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:342–346. - PubMed
    1. Brugman E, Reijneveld S, Verhulst F, Verloove-Vanhorick SP. Identification and management of psychosocial problems by preventive child health care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:462–469. - PubMed
    1. Fein JA, Pailler ME, Barg FK, et al. Feasibility and effects of a web-based adolescent psychiatric assessment administered by clinical staff in the pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(2):1112–1117. - PubMed
    1. Ford DE, Kamerow DB. Screening for psychiatric and substance abuse disorders in clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5(Suppl):S37–S41. - PubMed
    1. Kemper KJ. Self-administered Questionnaire for Psychosocial Screening in Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 1992;89:433–436. - PubMed

Publication types