Comparison of freehand-navigated and aiming device-navigated targeting of liver lesions

Int J Med Robot. 2014 Mar;10(1):35-43. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1505. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

Abstract

Background: Accurate needle placement is crucial for the success of percutaneous radiological needle interventions. We compared three guiding methods using an optical-based navigation system: freehand, using a stereotactic aiming device and active depth control, and using a stereotactic aiming device and passive depth control.

Methods: For each method, 25 punctures were performed on a non-rigid phantom. Five 1 mm metal screws were used as targets. Time requirements were recorded, and target positioning errors (TPE) were measured on control scans as the distance between needle tip and target.

Results: Time requirements were reduced using the aiming device and passive depth control. The Euclidian TPE was similar for each method (4.6 ± 1.2-4.9 ± 1.7 mm). However, the lateral component was significantly lower when an aiming device was used (2.3 ± 1.3-2.8 ± 1.6 mm with an aiming device vs 4.2 ± 2.0 mm without).

Discussion: Using an aiming device may increase the lateral accuracy of navigated needle insertion.

Keywords: image-guided therapy; interventional radiology; stereotaxy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Calibration
  • Equipment Design
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Metals / chemistry
  • Needles
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Punctures / instrumentation
  • Radiography, Interventional / instrumentation*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Robotics
  • Stereotaxic Techniques / instrumentation
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted / instrumentation*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Substances

  • Metals