US nationwide trends in carotid revascularization: hospital outcome and predictors of outcome from 1998 to 2007
- PMID: 23834476
- DOI: 10.1111/ane.12163
US nationwide trends in carotid revascularization: hospital outcome and predictors of outcome from 1998 to 2007
Abstract
Objectives: The goals of the study were to assess US nationwide trends in hospital outcome following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) and to determine potential predictors of outcome.
Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample, constituting a 20% representative and stratified sample of non-federal US hospitals, was analyzed retrospectively from years 1998 to 2007.
Results: The annual number of CEA decreased (137,877-111,658) and increased for CAS (2318-14,415). Inhospital mortality following CEA decreased from 0.4% to 0.3% (P < 0.001), whereas long-term facility (LTF) discharge increased from 8.2% to 10.5% (P < 0.001). Discharge outcome improved for CAS in both categories (mortality 2-0.5%; LTF discharge 10.7-8.3%; both P < 0.001). The trend analysis revealed an increase in patient age and a worsening comorbid profile over time. Age, women, length of stay, atrial fibrillation, and carotid stenosis with infarction were important determinants of unfavorable hospital outcome.
Conclusion: From a nationwide practice perspective, the number of carotid revascularizations fell by 10%. CEA has resulted in stable hospital mortality rates. Meanwhile, CAS has been increasingly utilized with overall improvement in short-term outcome. Our results further suggest a decrease in the number of patients with treatment-eligible carotid disease over time. However, the increasing prevalence of high-risk comorbidity in the aging population may pose a challenge to revascularization strategies.
Keywords: carotid angioplasty and stenting; carotid endarterectomy; carotid stenosis; stroke; treatment.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
US nationwide trends in carotid revascularization: is there a clinical opportunity cost associated with the introduction of novel medical devices?Acta Neurol Scand. 2014 Feb;129(2):94-101. doi: 10.1111/ane.12152. Epub 2013 Jun 15. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014. PMID: 23772989
-
National trends in carotid artery revascularization surgery.J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1251-7. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS111320. Epub 2012 Apr 6. J Neurosurg. 2012. PMID: 22482791
-
Intracranial hemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in the United States in 2005.J Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar;49(3):623-8; discussion 628-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.064. J Vasc Surg. 2009. PMID: 19268766
-
Carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting utilization trends over time.BMC Neurol. 2012 Mar 29;12:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-17. BMC Neurol. 2012. PMID: 22458607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent concepts in the management of extracranial carotid stenosis: carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting.Neurol India. 2011 May-Jun;59(3):376-82. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.82741. Neurol India. 2011. PMID: 21743166 Review.
Cited by
-
De-adoption and exnovation in the use of carotid revascularization: retrospective cohort study.BMJ. 2017 Oct 26;359:j4695. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4695. BMJ. 2017. PMID: 29074624 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Clinical Trial Results on the Temporal Trends of Carotid Endarterectomy and Stenting From 2002 to 2014.Stroke. 2016 Dec;47(12):2923-2930. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014856. Epub 2016 Nov 10. Stroke. 2016. PMID: 27834754 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
