Sex disparities in the quality of diabetes care: biological and cultural factors may play a different role for different outcomes: a cross-sectional observational study from the AMD Annals initiative
- PMID: 23835692
- PMCID: PMC3781503
- DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0184
Sex disparities in the quality of diabetes care: biological and cultural factors may play a different role for different outcomes: a cross-sectional observational study from the AMD Annals initiative
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the quality of type 2 diabetes care according to sex.
Research design and methods: Clinical data collected during the year 2009 were extracted from electronic medical records; quality-of-care indicators were evaluated. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate the likelihood of women versus men to be monitored for selected parameters, to reach clinical outcomes, and to be treated with specific classes of drugs. The intercenter variability in the proportion of men and women achieving the targets was also investigated.
Results: Overall, 415,294 patients from 236 diabetes outpatient centers were evaluated, of whom 188,125 (45.3%) were women and 227,169 (54.7%) were men. Women were 14% more likely than men to have HbA1c>9.0% in spite of insulin treatment (odds ratio 1.14 [95% CI 1.10-1.17]), 42% more likely to have LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)≥130 mg/dL (1.42 [1.38-1.46]) in spite of lipid-lowering treatment, and 50% more likely to have BMI≥30 kg/m2 (1.50 [1.50-1.54]). Women were less likely to be monitored for foot and eye complications. In 99% of centers, the percentage of men reaching the LDL-C target was higher than in women, the proportion of patients reaching the HbA1c target was in favor of men in 80% of the centers, and no differences emerged for blood pressure.
Conclusions: Women show a poorer quality of diabetes care than men. The attainment of the LDL-C target seems to be mainly related to pathophysiological factors, whereas patient and physician attitudes can play an important role in other process measures and outcomes.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[AMD Annals: a model of continuous monitoring and improvement of the quality of diabetes care].Epidemiol Prev. 2011 Jan-Feb;35(1):18-26. Epidemiol Prev. 2011. PMID: 21436491 Italian.
-
Gender-Disparities in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: More Than a Quality of Care Issue. A Cross-Sectional Observational Study from the AMD Annals Initiative.PLoS One. 2016 Oct 3;11(10):e0162960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162960. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27695110 Free PMC article.
-
Women show worse control of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk factors than men: results from the MIND.IT Study Group of the Italian Society of Diabetology.Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Mar;23(3):235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Mar 6. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013. PMID: 22397873
-
Sex and age differences in the achievement of control targets in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from a population-based study in a South European region.BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Oct 12;17(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0533-9. BMC Fam Pract. 2016. PMID: 27729015 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of metformin on blood pressure, plasma cholesterol and triglycerides in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.J Intern Med. 2004 Jul;256(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01328.x. J Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15189360 Review.
Cited by
-
Sex differences in cardiovascular risk, lifestyle, and psychological factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Fukuoka Diabetes Registry.Biol Sex Differ. 2023 May 22;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13293-023-00517-8. Biol Sex Differ. 2023. PMID: 37211595 Free PMC article.
-
Age- and Gender-Related Differences in LDL-Cholesterol Management in Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:957105. doi: 10.1155/2015/957105. Epub 2015 Mar 19. Int J Endocrinol. 2015. PMID: 25873960 Free PMC article.
-
The Burden of Structured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose on Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life and Locus of Control in Patients with Noninsulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: The PRISMA Study.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Jul;18(7):421-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0358. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016. PMID: 27327185 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Prevention in Type 2: Diabetes in a Real-World Practice Database.J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):2196. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082196. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35456292 Free PMC article.
-
Modification of the Association Between Severe Hypoglycemia and Ischemic Heart Disease by Surrogates of Vascular Damage Severity in Type 1 Diabetes During ∼30 Years of Follow-up in the DCCT/EDIC Study.Diabetes Care. 2021 Sep;44(9):2132-2139. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2757. Epub 2021 Jul 7. Diabetes Care. 2021. PMID: 34233927 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McGregor AJ, Choo E. Gender-specific medicine: yesterday’s neglect, tomorrow’s opportunities. Acad Emerg Med 2012;19:861–865 - PubMed
-
- Legato MJ, Gelzer A, Goland R, et al. Writing Group for The Partnership for Gender-Specific Medicine Gender-specific care of the patient with diabetes: review and recommendations. Gend Med 2006;3:131–158 - PubMed
-
- Juutilainen A, Kortelainen S, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Gender difference in the impact of type 2 diabetes on coronary heart disease risk. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2898–2904 - PubMed
-
- Kanaya AM, Grady D, Barrett-Connor E. Explaining the sex difference in coronary heart disease mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1737–1745 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
