Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening: analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits
- PMID: 23835817
- PMCID: PMC3704491
- DOI: 10.1370/afm.1509
Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening: analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits
Abstract
Purpose: Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a controversial issue. The present study aimed to explore physician behaviors during an unannounced standardized patient encounter that was part of a randomized controlled trial to educate physicians using a prostate cancer screening, interactive, Web-based module.
Methods: Participants included 118 internal medicine and family medicine physicians from 5 health systems in California, in 2007-2008. Control physicians received usual education about prostate cancer screening (brochures from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention). Intervention physicians participated in the prostate cancer screening module. Within 3 months, all physicians saw unannounced standardized patients who prompted prostate cancer screening discussions in clinic. The encounter was audio-recorded, and the recordings were transcribed. Authors analyzed physician behaviors around screening: (1) engagement after prompting, (2) degree of shared decision making, and (3) final recommendations for prostate cancer screening.
Results: After prompting, 90% of physicians discussed prostate cancer screening. In comparison with control physicians, intervention physicians showed somewhat more shared decision making behaviors (intervention 14 items vs control 11 items, P <.05), were more likely to mention no screening as an option (intervention 63% vs control 26%, P <.05), to encourage patients to consider different screening options (intervention 62% vs control 39%, P <.05) and seeking input from others (intervention 25% vs control 7%, P<.05).
Conclusions: A brief Web-based interactive educational intervention can improve shared decision making, neutrality in recommendation, and reduce PSA test ordering. Engaging patients in discussion of the uses and limitations of tests with uncertain value can decrease utilization of the tests.
Keywords: health communication; medical education; patient-centered care; primary care; prostate cancer; prostate cancer screening; qualitative analysis; randomized controlled trial; risk-benefit assessment; shared decision making; unannounced standardized patients.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Pairing physician education with patient activation to improve shared decisions in prostate cancer screening: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):324-34. doi: 10.1370/afm.1550. Ann Fam Med. 2013. PMID: 23835818 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening.Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):306-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1539. Ann Fam Med. 2013. PMID: 23835816 Free PMC article.
-
Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0870-8. J Cancer Educ. 2016. PMID: 26498649 Free PMC article.
-
American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale.BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):543-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12318. BJU Int. 2013. PMID: 23924423 Review.
-
Prostate Cancer Screening.Med Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;102(2):199-214. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.11.001. Med Clin North Am. 2018. PMID: 29406053 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Prostate-specific antigen testing patterns and prostate cancer stage at diagnosis in older Ohio cancer patients.Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Dec;35(12):1531-1540. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01908-x. Epub 2024 Sep 3. Cancer Causes Control. 2024. PMID: 39225950 Free PMC article.
-
Limited Evidence of Shared Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in Audio-Recorded Primary Care Visits Among Black Men and their Healthcare Providers.J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Oct;26(5):866-877. doi: 10.1007/s10903-024-01606-5. Epub 2024 Jun 1. J Immigr Minor Health. 2024. PMID: 38822923 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of shared decision making training programs for general practitioners.BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 29;24(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05557-1. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38811922 Free PMC article.
-
Shared medical decision in prostate cancer screening in primary care: a systematic literature review of current evidence.Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jul;56(7):2251-2259. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-03947-4. Epub 2024 Feb 6. Int Urol Nephrol. 2024. PMID: 38316684 Review.
-
Evaluating the Impact of a Training Program in Shared Decision-Making for Neurologists Treating People with Migraine.Neurol Ther. 2023 Aug;12(4):1319-1334. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00495-4. Epub 2023 Jun 13. Neurol Ther. 2023. PMID: 37310593 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. ERSPC Investigators Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1320–1328 - PubMed
-
- Volk RJ, Cass AR, Spann SJ. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med. 1999; 8(4):333–340 - PubMed
-
- Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(11):762–771 - PubMed
-
- Moyer VAU.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2):120–134 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous