Comparative tolerability and harms of individual statins: a study-level network meta-analysis of 246 955 participants from 135 randomized, controlled trials
- PMID: 23838105
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000071
Comparative tolerability and harms of individual statins: a study-level network meta-analysis of 246 955 participants from 135 randomized, controlled trials
Abstract
Background: Our objective was to estimate the comparative harms of individual statins using both placebo-controlled and active-comparator trials.
Methods and results: We systematically reviewed randomized trials evaluating different statins in participants with and without cardiovascular disease. We performed random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses to quantify the relative harms of individual statins. We included 55 two-armed placebo-controlled and 80 two- or multiarmed active-comparator trials including 246,955 individuals. According to pairwise meta-analyses, individual statins were not different than control in terms of myalgia, creatine kinase elevation, cancer, and discontinuations because of adverse events. Statins as a class resulted in significantly higher odds of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.16) and transaminase elevations (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.84) compared with control. When individual statins were compared in network meta-analyses, there were numerous statistically detectable differences, favoring simvastatin and pravastatin. According to dose-level comparisons, individual statins resulted in higher odds of discontinuations with higher doses of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. Similarly, higher doses of atorvasatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin were associated with higher odds of transaminase elevations. Simvastatin at its highest doses was associated with creatine kinase elevations (odds ratio, 4.14; 95% credible interval, 1.08-16.24). Meta-regression analyses adjusting for study-level age at baseline, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and publication year did not explain heterogeneity. There was no detectable inconsistency in the network.
Conclusions: As a class, adverse events associated with statin therapy are not common. Statins are not associated with cancer risk but do result in a higher odds of diabetes mellitus. Among individual statins, simvastatin and pravastatin seem safer and more tolerable than other statins.
Keywords: Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; adverse effects; cardiovascular agents; cardiovascular disease; coronary disease; meta-analysis; statins.
Similar articles
-
Dose-comparative effects of different statins on serum lipid levels: a network meta-analysis of 256,827 individuals in 181 randomized controlled trials.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):658-70. doi: 10.1177/2047487313483600. Epub 2013 Mar 25. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23529608 Review.
-
Comparative benefits of statins in the primary and secondary prevention of major coronary events and all-cause mortality: a network meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and active-comparator trials.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):641-57. doi: 10.1177/2047487313480435. Epub 2013 Feb 27. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23447425 Review.
-
Meta-analysis of drug-induced adverse events associated with intensive-dose statin therapy.Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.008. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 17472818
-
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and LDL-C goal attainment among elderly patients treated with rosuvastatin compared with other statins in routine clinical practice.Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007 Sep;5(3):185-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.10.002. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007. PMID: 17996658
-
Comparative Lipid-Lowering/Increasing Efficacy of 7 Statins in Patients with Dyslipidemia, Cardiovascular Diseases, or Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analyses of 50 Randomized Controlled Trials.Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Apr 23;2020:3987065. doi: 10.1155/2020/3987065. eCollection 2020. Cardiovasc Ther. 2020. PMID: 32411300 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Randomized phase 2 study of valproic acid combined with simvastatin and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel-based regimens in untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: the VESPA trial study protocol.BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):1167. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12936-w. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39300376 Free PMC article.
-
The Polypill: A New Alternative in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease.J Clin Med. 2024 May 29;13(11):3179. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113179. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892892 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolving Strategies for Use of Phytochemicals in Prevention and Long-Term Management of Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD).Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 4;25(11):6176. doi: 10.3390/ijms25116176. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38892364 Free PMC article. Review.
-
First Iranian guidelines for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of hyperlipidemia in adults.J Res Med Sci. 2024 Mar 29;29:18. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_318_23. eCollection 2024. J Res Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38808220 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of endophenotypes supporting outcome prediction in hemodialysis patients based on mechanistic markers of statin treatment.Heliyon. 2024 May 6;10(9):e30709. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30709. eCollection 2024 May 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38765135 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
