Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;21(e1):e71-7.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001804. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

The impact of electronic health records on people with diabetes in three different emergency departments

Stuart M Speedie  1 , Young-Taek Park, Jing Du, Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt, Barry A Bershow, Raymond A Gensinger Jr, Daniel T Routhe, Donald P Connelly
Affiliations

The impact of electronic health records on people with diabetes in three different emergency departments

Stuart M Speedie et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if electronic health records (EHR) with prior clinical information have observable effects for patients with diabetes presenting to emergency departments (ED), we examined measures of quality and resource utilization.

Materials and methods: Retrospective observational studies of patients in three ED (A=5510; B=4393; C=3324) were conducted comparing patients with prior information in the EHR to those without such information. Differences with respect to hospitalization, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and numbers of ED orders for tests, procedures and medications were examined after adjusting for age, gender, race, marital status, comorbidities and for acuity level within each ED.

Results: There were 7% fewer laboratory test orders at one ED and 3% fewer at another; fewer diagnostic procedures were performed at two of the sites. At one site 36% fewer medications were ordered. The odds of being hospitalized were lower for EHR patients at one site and hospital LOS was shorter at two of the sites. EHR patient ED LOS was 18% longer at one site. There was no demonstrable impact of an EHR on mortality. Results varied in magnitude and direction by site.

Discussion: The pattern of significant results varied by ED but tended to reveal reduced utilization and better outcomes for patients although EHR patients' ED LOS was longer at one site.

Conclusions: The presence of prior information in an EHR may be a valuable adjunct in the care of diabetes patients in ED settings but the pattern of impact may vary from ED to ED.

Keywords: diabetes; electronic health records; emergency department; evaluation; health outcome assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011
    1. HCUPnet: statistics on emergency department use. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project; http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov (accessed 28 Feb 2013).
    1. Clancy CM. Care transitions: a threat and an opportunity for patient safety. Am J Med Qual 2006;21:415–17 - PubMed
    1. Stiell A, Forster AJ, Stiell IG, et al. Prevalence of information gaps in the emergency department and the effect on patient outcomes. CMAJ 2003;169:1023–8 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shapiro JS, Kannry J, Kushniruk AW, et al. New York clinical information exchange (NYCLIX) clinical advisory subcommittee. Emergency physicians’ perceptions of health information exchange. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:700–5 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types