"What about building 7?" A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories
- PMID: 23847577
- PMCID: PMC3703523
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409
"What about building 7?" A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories
Abstract
Recent research into the psychology of conspiracy belief has highlighted the importance of belief systems in the acceptance or rejection of conspiracy theories. We examined a large sample of conspiracist (pro-conspiracy-theory) and conventionalist (anti-conspiracy-theory) comments on news websites in order to investigate the relative importance of promoting alternative explanations vs. rejecting conventional explanations for events. In accordance with our hypotheses, we found that conspiracist commenters were more likely to argue against the opposing interpretation and less likely to argue in favor of their own interpretation, while the opposite was true of conventionalist commenters. However, conspiracist comments were more likely to explicitly put forward an account than conventionalist comments were. In addition, conspiracists were more likely to express mistrust and made more positive and fewer negative references to other conspiracy theories. The data also indicate that conspiracists were largely unwilling to apply the "conspiracy theory" label to their own beliefs and objected when others did so, lending support to the long-held suggestion that conspiracy belief carries a social stigma. Finally, conventionalist arguments tended to have a more hostile tone. These tendencies in persuasive communication can be understood as a reflection of an underlying conspiracist worldview in which the details of individual conspiracy theories are less important than a generalized rejection of official explanations.
Keywords: archival research; conspiracy theories; online discussion; persuasion; social influence.
Similar articles
-
Online communication as a window to conspiracist worldviews.Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 17;6:836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00836. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26136717 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: the generic conspiracist beliefs scale.Front Psychol. 2013 May 21;4:279. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23734136 Free PMC article.
-
Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories.Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):443-63. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x. Epub 2011 Feb 25. Br J Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21751999
-
A gateway conspiracy? Belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories prospectively predicts greater conspiracist ideation.PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0275502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275502. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36288276 Free PMC article.
-
Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories.Nat Rev Psychol. 2023;2(2):85-97. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00133-0. Epub 2022 Nov 22. Nat Rev Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36467717 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Public perception of scientists: Experimental evidence on the role of sociodemographic, partisan, and professional characteristics.PLoS One. 2023 Jul 7;18(7):e0287572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287572. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37418395 Free PMC article.
-
The psychological and political correlates of conspiracy theory beliefs.Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 15;12(1):21672. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25617-0. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36522383 Free PMC article.
-
Design and Cross-Cultural Invariance of the COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (COVID-VCBS) in 13 Latin American Countries.Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 14;10:908720. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.908720. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35774567 Free PMC article.
-
What Is the Support for Conspiracy Beliefs About COVID-19 Vaccines in Latin America? A Prospective Exploratory Study in 13 Countries.Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:855713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.855713. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35602688 Free PMC article.
-
LOCO: The 88-million-word language of conspiracy corpus.Behav Res Methods. 2022 Aug;54(4):1794-1817. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01698-z. Epub 2021 Oct 25. Behav Res Methods. 2022. PMID: 34697754 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abalakina-Paap M., Stephan W. G., Craig T., Gregory W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Pol. Psychol. 20, 637–647 10.1111/0162-895X.00160 - DOI
-
- Adorno T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D. J., Sanford R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. Oxford: Harpers
-
- Barkun M. (2006). A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
-
- Barber P. (2008, June 7). The truth is out there. Financ. Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/8d66e778-3128-11dd-ab22-000077b07658.html
-
- Bartlett J., Miller C. (2011). A bestiary of the 9/11 truth movement: notes from the front line. Skeptical Inquirer 35, 43–46
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
