Utility of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for diabetes screening
- PMID: 23867023
- PMCID: PMC3752602
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.02.026
Utility of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for diabetes screening
Abstract
Background: Federal law requires certain private insurers to cover and waive patient cost sharing for preventive medical services that receive a grade of B or better from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). The USPSTF recommends that asymptomatic adults who have a blood pressure (BP) higher than 135/80 mmHg be screened for type 2 diabetes.
Purpose: The goals of this study were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the USPSTF screening criteria and to determine the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidity among undiagnosed individuals by USPSTF criteria.
Methods: Data come from 7189 adults who participated in the 2003-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; statistical analysis was conducted in 2011-2012. Participants with fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5% who did not self-report a diagnosis of diabetes were categorized as having undiagnosed diabetes.
Results: Among people without diagnosed diabetes, 4.0% had undiagnosed diabetes. The proportion of adults with undiagnosed diabetes who were identified (sensitivity) using BP >135/80 mmHg as the screening standard was 44.4%; among individuals without undiagnosed diabetes, 74.8% had BP ≤135/80 mmHg (specificity). For those with undiagnosed diabetes, the prevalence of HbA1c 7.0%-<8.0% was 10.6% for those with BP ≤135/80 mmHg and 14.3% for those with BP >135/80 mmHg; and 12.8% and 9.4% for HbA1c ≥8.0%, respectively. Elevated low-density lipoprotein (100-160 mg/dL) was similar by BP cut-point (52%-53%). For those with BP ≤135/80 mmHg, 16.7% had a history of cardiovascular disease and 22.9% had chronic kidney disease.
Conclusions: The USPSTF screening recommendations result in missing more than half of those who have undiagnosed diabetes, and a substantial proportion of these people have increased low-density lipoprotein and other cardiovascular risk factors.
Copyright © 2013 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for diabetes screening: time to revisit the evidence?Am J Prev Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):246-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.05.001. Am J Prev Med. 2013. PMID: 23867034 No abstract available.
-
Author response.Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):e17-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.004. Am J Prev Med. 2014. PMID: 24355680 No abstract available.
-
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force diabetes screening.Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):e17. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.003. Am J Prev Med. 2014. PMID: 24355681 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Performance of the 2015 US Preventive Services Task Force Screening Criteria for Prediabetes and Undiagnosed Diabetes.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1100-1108. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4436-4. Epub 2018 Apr 12. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29651678 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of a Random Glucose Case-Finding Strategy to Detect Undiagnosed Diabetes.Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):710-716. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.023. Epub 2017 Mar 6. Am J Prev Med. 2017. PMID: 28279547 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in control of cardiovascular risk factors among US adults with type 2 diabetes from 1999 to 2010: comparison by prevalent cardiovascular disease status.Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013 Nov;10(6):505-13. doi: 10.1177/1479164113496828. Epub 2013 Aug 22. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013. PMID: 23975724 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for type 2 diabetes: a short report for the National Screening Committee.Health Technol Assess. 2013 Aug;17(35):1-90. doi: 10.3310/hta17350. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23972041 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening for type 2 diabetes: literature review and economic modelling.Health Technol Assess. 2007 May;11(17):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-125. doi: 10.3310/hta11170. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17462167 Review.
Cited by
-
Opportunistic detection of type 2 diabetes using deep learning from frontal chest radiographs.Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 7;14(1):4039. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39631-x. Nat Commun. 2023. PMID: 37419921 Free PMC article.
-
Disparity in association of obesity measures with ankle and brachial systolic blood pressures in Europeans and South Asians.Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 2;12(1):9174. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13372-1. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35655080 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for Diabetes and Prediabetes.Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;50(3):369-385. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2021.05.002. Epub 2021 Jul 12. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2021. PMID: 34399951 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differential associations of ankle and brachial blood pressures with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: cross-sectional study.Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 30;11(1):9406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88973-3. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33931717 Free PMC article.
-
Multilevel Variation in Diabetes Screening Within an Integrated Health System.Diabetes Care. 2020 May;43(5):1016-1024. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1622. Epub 2020 Mar 5. Diabetes Care. 2020. PMID: 32139383 Free PMC article.
References
-
- CDC. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the US. Vol. 2011. Atlanta GA: DHHS, CDC; 2011.
-
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, editor. About the USPSTF: Introduction. Rockville MD: 2010.
-
- Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):212–4. - PubMed
-
- Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: U S Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(11):846–54. - PubMed
-
- Handelsman Y, Mechanick JI, Blonde L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan. Endocr Pract. 2011;17 (Suppl 2):1–53. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
